No consensus on issues surrounding water shortage
Many Klamath Basin water users
agree: Federal money diverted to the region has aided farmers, who
agreed to leave parts of their land bare due to water shortages.
But a consensus over the scope
of the 2010 drought ends
there. Vast reaches of the Basin's soil are dry due to land idling.
And Tom Mallams, president of
the Klamath Off-Project Water Users, feels the government has
overstated the severity of drought conditions here.
“This is a man-made drought, no
doubt about it,” Mallams said. While he said he supports farmers’
rights to be compensated for leaving their land dry, millions of
federal dollars have been diverted to a region whose real problem
lies in its wetlands. Those wetlands, he said, “consume anywhere
from two to four times as much water as irrigable lands do.”
Kevin Moore, spokesman for the
Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Basin Area Office, said his
department’s initial analysis of expected rainwater indicated
drastic shortages for Upper Klamath Lake. That
analysis was conducted at the beginning of the year.
“Our models indicated that the
drought was going to be worse than it turned out to be,” he said. A
colder than-average May helped deter evaporation from the lake’s
supply, which gave irrigators a more abundant source when the water
supply was opened to farmers later that month.
“The reduced
demand on the resource was the result of the cooler weather,” Moore
said.
“We still have a huge problem.”
Others say this year’s drought
has not reached the level many feared because of the sheer number of
farmers who ag reed to idle their land. That number has been
bolstered by more than $13 million in total funds channeled here for
those farmers.
“The reason we’ve been able to
manage this year is primarily because of the land idling and
groundwater substitution,” said Klamath Irrigation District Manager
Dave Solem. Groundwater substitution refers to farmers tapping into
wells, rather than using lake water for their crops.
But Solem indicated this year
has still been among the most difficult to manage. The severity of
this year’s shortage can be seen from the quantity of land in his
district — as much as 7,000 acres — that received no water until
July 10.
“And all of the Shasta View and
Malin irrigation districts are not taking water from the (Upper
Klamath) Lake,” he added.
Much of the money diverted to
the Klamath Basin for land idling has been funneled through the
Klamath Water and Power Authority. KWAPA Executive Director Hollie
Cannon said the money, coupled with increased well use and planning
by farmers, mitigated what looked to be among the worst water years
in recent history. Most land-owners were aware
of a potential shortage as early
as February, giving them enough time to look into alternative
sources of irrigation.
“The agricultural disaster is
not near what it would have been” as a result of that planning,
Cannon said. But with several months to go in this year’s production
season, few can say what impact dwindling water resources will have.
“We still have a huge problem,”
Cannon said.
A war funding
bill signed by President Barack Obama last week included $10 million
in drought relief aid. Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., and Sens. Ron Wyden
and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. successfully lobbied to include the funding
with the current Klamath Basin drought in mind.
But how much of that money makes
it to the Basin remains to be seen. According to Greg Addington,
executive director of the Klamath Water Users Association, water
users will have to apply for their share of money, competing with
other drought-plagued regions throughout the Western United States.
“It’s sort of fair game,”
Addington said of the money. Others said they did not know how much
money would eventually get to the Basin, or when it would get here.
“Through the Drought Relief Act,
any county that is a drought-declared disaster can apply for the use
of those funds,” said Klamath Water and Power Authority Executive
Director Hollie Cannon.
“While our
congressional leaders intended it to come to the Klamath Basin, the
method by which we get it is to compete with other drought relief
counties.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml