Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.

 

 

 

 

      

 
 

Endless negotiations won’t accomplish much   

 

Herald and News

Letter to the Editor

December 29, 2011

 

   I am writing in reference to recent inaccurate guest opinions about the Klamath Adjudication Proposed Order. Some people believed in a free lunch and failed to file legal challenges to Klamath Tribal instream claims. Instead, they left other people with the bill, trying to challenge these claims. If everybody would have followed the direction of the free lunch crowd, these claims would have already been granted and enforced since the last several years have been dedicated to hearings challenging these claims. Despite inaccurate statements to the contrary, litigation has resulted in many claims being reduced in excess of 50 percent.

 

   These people have now decided the solution to the problems is negotiation. They have a unique negotiation strategy: refuse to participate in litigation, so they have no chance of prevailing in court; and agree to support the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement which supports granting the Tribes what they want up front, (dam removal, 92,000 acres of deeded land, millions in fishery money, etc.), thereby surrendering potential leverage,   without guaranteed protection from Tribal in-stream claims. They then vigorously attack their neighbors who are opposing Tribal claims, while at the same time they profess the need to work together. I can easily understand why the Tribes love negotiating with these people. But I would not hold my breath for a successful outcome.

 

   My experience is that the Klamath Tribes are not willing to make meaningful claim reductions, but instead keep irrigators in endless negotiations. When I was in Klamath County, Upper Basin leaders spent over a decade trying to settle these claims. Two separate written settlement concepts were reached, which Tribal leaders approved. These settlements concepts would have provided protections for irrigators. Unfortunately though, when push came to shove we could never get to the next stage of actually getting them to modify their claims.

 

   Edward Bartell

 

   Orovada, Nev.

 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml