|
Farm
bill veto
Bill
has money for programs that would help the Basin
By
DD BIXBY
H&N
Staff Writer
May 22, 2008
The House quickly rejected President Bush’s veto Wednesday of a $290
billion farm bill, and the Senate was poised to do so today.
The 2007 farm bill is seven months overdue. Unlike its
2002 predecessor, it doesn’t contain specific funds for the
Klamath
Basin
, but it provides money for
programs of special interest here, specifically watershed enhancement.
The leg islation also includes election-year subsidies
for farmers and food stamps for the poor.
About two-thirds of the bill would pay for nutrition
programs such as food stamps; about $40 billion is for farm subsidies;
and an additional $30 billion would go to farmers to idle their land and
to other environmental programs.
Hours before the House’s 316 -108 override vote,
Bush vetoed the five-year measure, saying it was too expensive and gave
too much money to wealthy farmers when farm incomes are high.
The bill would make small cuts to direct payments,
which are distributed to some farmers no matter how much they grow. It
also would eliminate some payments to individuals with more than
$750,000 in annual farm income — or married farmers who make more than
$1.5 million.
Sorting it out
Klamath Basin Research and
Extension
Center
director Willie Riggs
called the bill a “healthy piece of legislation” for the
Klamath
Basin
and
Oregon
, but said it would be a
while before its exact implications become clear.
Jennifer Simon, executive director at Klamath Farm
Service Agency, on Wednesday still didn’t know what the farm bill
might mean for
Klamath
County
.
The agency typically pays out $1 to $2 million for its
programs, but without an active farm bill, the office has been quiet
because there are no programs for farmers.
The 20 02 farm bill expired in September, and
lawmakers have been working for seven months to pass the new one.
Pros and cons
She guessed the 2007 farm bill would flesh out languishing
programs, allowing for larger payments to producers, helping widen slim
margins caused by skyrocketing costs.
But, she said, there may also be producers who
aren’t eligible for the bill’s programs because of crops, income
limits and other changes are not clear at this time.
Modoc County Farm Service Agency director Chris Lauppe
said Tuesday he wasn’t waiting with bated breath.
“When it comes, it comes,” he said. “We’ve had
some producers call, but the money they get from here doesn’t make or
break their operations.”
Waiting game
Lauppe also said that an override vote might not end
the waiting game because changes would have to be made to current
programs and new handbooks would have to be written.
When programs and dollars finally make it to
Modoc
County
, the share would be likely
be small. The county typically receives less than $1 million for all
programs.
“We’re not getting big and excited about it,” he
said. “We know there’s going to be something and we’re here to
implement it. Nobody’s retiring at
Modoc
County
because of the farm
bill.”
Side
Bars
The
farm bill and Oregon
U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., released a statement last week with a
list of farm bill programs that would impact Oregonians:
The bill includes:
n $3.8 billion in additional funding for the Permanent Disaster Trust
Fund.
n $1.3 billion to encourage innovation and specialization in farming.
n $8 billion in new funding for conservation.
n $1 billion for investment in future fuels — biomass, cellulosic and
biofuels — moving away from corn-based fuels that affect dairy and
cattle industries.
n $75 million in grants, loans and incentives to help new farmers and
ranchers.
n $170 million in emergency funding for communities impacted by the
closure of the salmon season.
Mixup
throws override in doubt
WASHINGTON (AP) — Action on the farm bill stalled
Wednesday after the discovery that Congress omitted a 34-page section of
the bill when lawmakers sent the massive measure to the White House.
House Democrats hoped to pass the entire bill, again, today under
expedited rules usually reserved for unopposed legislation.
The Senate was expected to follow suit.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews
|