Final draft of water agreement nearly
done
Meetings in Portland continue through Friday
By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff Writer
A final draft of the Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement may soon be available.
Stakeholders, who’ve worked on the
document for years, began meeting in Portland Tuesday and are expected
to continue to do so through Friday.
Klamath County Commissioner John
Elliott said stakeholders aim to finish revisions at the meeting, but
could possibly meet in Sacramento next week if necessary.
Tom Mallams, an irrigator off the
Klamath Reclamation Project and president of the Klamath Off-Project
Water Users, said he expects meetings in Sacramento to be necessary, but
he does not expect the document to change enough to
garner his support.
Mallams said he would not attend the
meetings until Friday, as stakeholders will be discussing hydropower
issues and he was not allowed to participate. He fully expects a final
document to be available soon, but said he thinks the whole negotiation
process has been improper.
Craig Tucker, Klamath ca mpa ig n
coordinator for the Karuk Tribe, said adjustments to the document mostly
involved reconciling dates and timetables.
“The kinds of edits and changes that
are happen i ng now a re small and subtle,” he said.
He wasn’t sure when the final
document would be released to the public, but feels more people are
supportive of it in the lower portion of the Klamath River watershed,
partially with the help of public debates.
“We’re handling the critics just
fine,” Tucker said.
“They’re not willing to take our
proposals seriously unless we sign on to (the agreement),” Mallams said.
Farmers, tribes, fishermen,
conservationists and government officials, along with Portland-based
utility PacifiCorp, finalized a related Klamath River dam removal
agreement weeks ago.
Meetings have continued on the
restoration agreement to make it consistent with the dam removal
agreement and address changes brought up by stakeholders.
Elliott said he submitted several
changes sought by the Klamath County government, but could not say what
the likelihood was that they would be included. He said he “feels pretty
comfortable at this point.”
“I’m still positive
about the agreement,” he said. “Some things still need to be ironed
out.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml