|
|
![]() |
| Yurok tribal member Troy Fletcher has spent his life fishing along the Klamath and Trinity rivers. |
HOOPA,
As a boy, the Yurok Indian grew up along the
“When I was younger, we spent all our time on the
Trinity and the Klamath. Fishing was a big part of what we did. When
you’re young, you don’t think of those terms,” he says of
sustenance fishing or regarding rivers as part of a tribe’s social
network. “You just go out and do it. As I got older and had my own
family, I have always participated in fishing activities, been outdoors
and done the things I always did.”
Declining
populations
He says a declining fish population is clear.
“It’s happened over time. It’s well documented.
It’s a fact. It’s declined in my lifetime. It’s declined in my
generations’ lifetime. More importantly, the quality of the water is
deteriorating because of the dams. As the health of the
Fletcher, 45, began fisheries work at
He was among the negotiators for the proposed Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement.
“I think the agreement represents a tremendous
effort to deal with some very tough issues. The most important thing is
(that), overall, we think it’s a pathway to stability. It means
changes, but it means changes that are reasonable.”
Meaning for
community
Fletcher says the
“Our tribal people are on the river all the time,”
he says. “The river is part of the social glue that holds the families
and the tribes together. That bond has always been there. Those life
legends of putting up food for the winter, of the value of hard work,
and of providing for your family. Those teach self-worth, self-esteem.
“Those are all good, strong meaningful things for
our community.”
Side Bar
Troy Fletcher on the Restoration Agreement:
What
he likes:
The Yurok Tribe member believes the main benefit would be removal of
four
He
also believes provisions setting water allocations for
“The
Yurok Tribe has been in the water as long, or longer, than anybody,”
he says of studies on fish populations and water quality. “We believe
we have a good handle on flows that are necessary. Now, outsiders are
criticizing us. We ask people to recognize we put our time in and
appreciate what’s good for fish.”
What he doesn’t
like:
“I
don’t want to focus on the things we don’t like because we can live
with the agreement because of the totality of the agreement. Overall the
agreement is great.”
But
he is disappointed that off-Project irrigators, who have criticized the
agreement, “chose not to show up” for most of the negotiations.
Fletcher believes off-Project irrigators deserve to have their interests
addressed, and says he and others support many of their concerns.
“The
avenues are still open.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews
/navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews