
Four
tribes sharing the river
By
Ty Beaver
H&N's
Staff Writer
February 15, 2008
They’ve
shared the same water system and share some traits, but the four tribes
along the
Klamath River
— from above
Upper Klamath Lake
to the
North
California
Coast
— descended from
different groups, had different languages, and developed unique
cultures.
“They
are very culturally distinct people who’ve been neighbors for a long
time,” said Craig Tucker of the Karuk Tribe.
Unlike
the tribes of the Plains, the tribes of the
Klamath River
established permanent
settlements, allowing them to develop sophisticated societies and
economies, Tucker said.
More than one of the tribes used a currency system and
interaction was common. Tucker said members of the Karuk Tribe could be
bi- or tri-lingual to communicate with their neighbors.
The
Klamath River
system was their common link. Part of their diets consisted of the
several species of salmon and lamprey that migrated up the river to
spawn, and suckers.
The
Klamath Tribes (consisting
of the Klamath, Modoc and Yahooskin people) lived in the upper reaches
of the watershed, from above
Upper Klamath Lake
and along the
Link
River
and upper portion of the
Klamath River
.
Klamath Tribes
Membership:
3,500 enrolled members Web site: klamathtribes.org Headquarters:
Chiloquin.
Klamath
Indian women with a string of suckers before 1911.
The
Karuks had
about 100 villages along the
Klamath River
and the
Salmon River
, one of the Klamath’s
tributaries far below Iron Gate Dam.
Karuk
Tribe
Membership:
4,200 enrolled members Web site: karuk.us Headquarters: Happy Camp,
Calif.

The
Yuroks lived
along the last 45 miles of the
Klamath River
and along the
Pacific
Coast
. They fished the coast and,
along with the other
California
tribes, subsisted on the nuts of hardwood trees that grew in
the forests.
Yurok Tribe
Membership:
5,000
enrolled members
Web
site: yuroktribe.org
Headquarters:
Klamath,
Calif.
The
Hoopa lived along the
Trinity River
, the last tributary to
connect with the
Klamath River
before it reached the ocean.
Hoopa Tribe
Membership:
1,893 enrolled members
Web site:
hoopa-nsn.gov
Headquarters: Hoopa,
Calif.
The
arrival of European explorers and then settlers brought competition for
land. Exposure to new diseases sickened many natives, and resources they
depended on — fish and forest products — were depleted
Conflicts
arose. The Modoc War of 1873, for instance, occurred when the
U.S.
government tried to force
the Modocs onto a reservation.
All
four tribes are federally recognized, but the Klamath Tribes are the
only ones to have a treaty with the
U.S.
government.
The
Klamaths also have a unique history in that they lost federal
recognition for 30 years, bringing economic hardship and cultural
stigma.
The
federal government terminated the Klamath Tribes in the late 1950s. As a
result, it compensated tribal members for loss of recognition and all
tribal lands were sold. Tribal members also lost access to the various
government services offered to them through tribal status.
Congress restored the Tribes in 1986. The Klamaths
don’t have a reservation, but have common land holdings, including
their tribal government center near Chiloquin and Kla-Mo-Ya Casino,
north of
Klamath Falls
along Highway 97.
The other tribes involved in the agreement also have
land holdings. The Yuroks reside on the stretch of the
Klamath River
between the confluence with
the
Trinity River
and the coast.
The Karuks do not have a reservation but do have
several tracts of land in
Northern California
on which some of their
tribal members reside. The Hoopa continue to have the reservation
originally reserved for
Northern California
tribes in
Hoopa
Valley
.
All were involved in crafting the proposed Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement. All have interests in the watershed and in
the fish that live in it.
The Hoopa do not support the agreement, saying it does
not provide enough protection for fish, but the other tribes support it,
saying it will help restore links to their past culture and make them
economically and socially stable.
The Klamath Tribes would receive more than $20 million
to purchase 90,000 acres of private forestland as part of the agreement.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews
|