GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.
|
|
|
|
| Submitted photo - Athena Bagwell, whoI is Shasta, is concerned that removing dams will have negative impacts |
“I saw that on CNN and thought, ‘It’s time to go home,’ ” she said.
Home was Butte Valley, which she said was part of the ancestral home of Shasta Indians.
According to Bagwell, the Shasta Indian Nation’s vice
chairwoman, the Shastas had the largest aboriginal land base
of Northern California tribes, including what is now
Siskiyou County, along with sections of Klamath, Jackson and
Bagwell, 38, who lived in New York City until she moved to Atlanta as a 20 year old, first visited her tribe’s ancestral lands in 1996 while escaping the crowds in Atlanta during the 1996 Summer Olympics.
Since moving to Dorris, where she owns and operates Second
Time Around, Bagwell has
The lack of recognition is a sore spot.
“That’s a really ugly political issue. It’s a terrible injustice considering we were the largest tribe in the region,” said Bagwell. “We’re still working toward recognition. It’s a very, very important issue to me.”
The Shastas, unlike recognized tribes, have not been allowed to participate in negotiations involving the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, which deals with water rights along the Klamath River.
“We would like our rights and our interests protected,” Bagwell said, noting concerns about tribal artifacts and fears sediment behind dams proposed for removal will destroy Klamath River fisheries.
The tribe opposes the proposed removal of four Klamath River dams and, she said, wants to work with the California Department of Fish and Game to create tribal fish hatcheries and participate in other projects.
“Our main objective,” Bagwell said, “is to establish a working relationship with local and state government agencies, tribes and community members so that we all may benefit.”