
How
has farming changed during the last 20 years?
Klamath
Falls Herald and News
August
10, 2007
This
is a sample of comments from the Herald and News online survey.
·
I
was forced out of the family farm because of the value of land was
greater when put to other uses. We as a family could make more money by
selling the farm and putting the money into a bank and living off the
dividends without the wear and tear of the actual work of the farm. Sad
but true.
·
Corporate
farms provide bulk of food for the United States. Much produce and fruit
comes from other countries.
·
Much
wider use of machines, and technology has allowed comparable harvests
with less manpower.
·
Ag
has been devastated by dismal returns. It's likely that 75 percent of
farmers in the Tulelake area have gone broke in last 15 years. Example:
In 1947 my father sold barley for $97 per ton. In the last 20 years,
I've sold barley from $63 to $78. I've grown none the past five years.
·
There
is no farmland because it is being developed for people to live on.
·
Corporate
farming for the sake of subsidies that the government has set up benefit
a chosen few. It's just another scam for the sake of the 1-percenters.
·
More
technologically advanced and it takes more income and assets to keep
afloat.
·
Small
family farms are being bought out by large conglomerates that can afford
to suffer an occasional loss. Development in the urban areas has brought
tougher environmental laws that also affect smaller farms.
·
Equipment
for farming is very expensive, cost of farming is out of sight. A lot of
people don't understand farming so they don't support it. Farming is the
original industry and backbone of America.
·
Farmers
are for the most part better educated, better at conservation and not as
locally focused as before.
·
Land
values have become too expensive. Overhead expenses are too high.
There's volatility in the cattle market. People who really know cattle
are fewer. It's just not as fun as it used to be.
·
There
is less income, more expenses and less respect for the time and
conditions of today's farmer.
Are
you concerned about the future of family farms?
·
A
good way of life is decreasing and with the decrease the strong family
values are less of a strength to our country. God-fearing people are
farmers and their decrease is a lessening of God-fearing ways in our
country as a whole.
·
There
is a huge market for organic products so if more farmers start to grow
organic foods, they will prosper.
·
Our
recent experiences with imported food and products points out the
serious pitfalls of relying on foreign nations for our basic
necessities.
·
Those
who specialize will survive; those trapped into the same old crops will
continue to suffer or fail completely.
·
There
is so much outside interference and special interests. While we're
producing the products civilization needs to survive, a large percentage
of people in urban areas - ”the people who depend on us the most - are
the people who give us the most grief.
·
Big
business may be able to grow the food we need, but they are absent from
supporting the communities. Most of the farms in Klamath County have
been in families for generations and it's just a shame people can't make
a living doing what they love.
·
We
live in a capitalist society. If the family farm can compete, good, if
not, then as all inefficient entities, they must perish.
·
I
think everyone should be concerned if they value family farms. Most
family farms are small and it is impossible to make a sufficient living
to maintain the farm, the equipment and care for the family.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a
prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational
purposes only. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.heraldandnews.com/articles/2007/08/10/viewpoints/viewpoints/views.txt
|