Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

 

 

      

Irrigation district members get look at water plan

 

About 100 people attend meeting in Merrill about settlement proposal  

 

By STEVE KADEL

H&N Staff Writer

January 26, 2008


   MERRILL — About 100 people turned out Friday night to learn details of the Klamath water settlement, and many heard something they already knew. 


   “It’s complicated,” said Dave Solem, Klamath Irrigation District manager. “There’s a lot of legalese so it’s sometimes hard to understand.” 


   However, he endorsed the 256 -page proposed settlement, saying, “My position is the benefits outweigh the negatives.” 


   The irrigation district sponsored the meeting, which was open to members of other irrigation districts and the general public. The session was at the
Merrill Civic Center


   By the numbers 


   Solem said one of the key provisions of the settlement puts into effect a permanent limitation on the quantity of water that can be diverted for irrigation. 


   The limits range from 330,000 acre-feet during a dry year up to 385,000 acre-feet in a wet year. Solem said average delivery to Klamath Project Irrigators from 1961 to 1985 was 340,000 acre feet. 


   Dry years 


   During dry years, irrigators may have to use groundwater or idle land on a temporary basis. 


   “That’s when the battle begins, in the dry years,” Solem said. 


   He said irrigators will still be required to deal with provisions of the Endangered Species Act. However, the plan says there will be a commitment to avoid or minimize any adverse impact in the form of new regulations as a result of introduction or re-introduction of a species. 


   Solem said a bright point for irrigators is that the amount of water allocated to Project members will be given first, with flows for fish following that. That’s different from the policy under biological opinions, which have given fish first priority. 


   Electric power 


   As for electrical power, Solem said the settlement includes a fund to keep power costs at three cents per kilowatt hour for three years, both for on-Project and off-Project irrigators. There’s also a provision for allocating reserve power from the
Columbia River system to serve the Klamath Project. 


   “We think we could get it for close to two cents,” Solem said of the
Columbia River power.
   In addition, $33 million is earmarked as incentive for energy efficiency, conservation and renewable generation for on-Project and off-Project users. 


   The settlement proposal also supports continued lease-land farming on the Tulelake and
Lower Klamath national wildlife refuges. 


   Political future 


   Solem acknowledged the political horizon is an unknown factor as settlement supporters try to garner congressional approval. 


   “We’re going to have a different president next year and we don’t know what that means for the Project, but we’ll have to deal with it,” he said.

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

Source:  http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/

navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews