KBRA limits water farmers will receive
Klamath Falls
Herald and News
Letter to the
Editor
The Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement is bad for agriculture.
One of many reasons is because
it limits the amount of water farmers receive, which is less than
farmers have historically received. At the same time, the KBRA
increases the amount of water the Tule Lake Wildlife Refuge gets,
which is more than it has historically received.
Klamath Watershed Basin property
owners and all irrigators’ water rights are in jeopardy.
Klamath Irrigation District does
not know how many of the irrigators they represent are “for” or
“against” the KBRA because they did not bother to take a poll or let
their constituents vote. The district’s board decided to sign the
KBRA agreement with a unanimous vote, regardless of the fact that
most of the irrigators we know are against this agreement.
The Klamath Irrigation District
requires landowners within their district to pay $5.50 per acre that
goes directly to the Klamath Water Users Association, which is not
representing the best interests of irrigators in Klamath County.
The “diverse groups” that have
worked on the KBRA are doing exactly what is needed to jeopardize
our individual property rights, whether knowingly or unknowingly.
By dividing the communities and
individuals and pitting them against each other, as they already
have, we then become easy targets that are divided and will be
conquered. Then we will lose the water rights which are so vital to
our land. Bigger bureaucracy is never the solution.
The solution is that water
adjudication should be finalized and issued to the property owners.
Then farmers should demand of their government that their water be
delivered as per the legal water rights.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml