KBRA
proponents’ spin doesn’t hold up to the facts
Klamath Falls Herald and News
It is time to
start calling Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement
proponents on their misleading spin.
For example, two
Klamath County commissioners wrote a guest opinion
implying that KBRA modifies the biological opinion
to provide water to farmers. Unfortunately, such
language cannot be found in the KBRA. In fact, the
KBRA specifically states that by signing the KBRA
the government is not prejudging the outcome of any
Endangered Species Act process (KBRA Section 22.5).
Other proponents
have stated the KBRA “guarantees” water for farmers.
The KBRA does not guarantee water for farmers. In
fact, in order to set the process in motion for
litigants to go after more water from Klamath
Reclamation Project farmers, KBRA signatories have
to “believe” that Klamath Project deliveries “may”
jeopardize endangered fish (KBRA Section
21.3.1.B.iv.e). It is hard to imagine how the KBRA
could have set the standard any lower for going
after Klamath Project water.
KBRA proponents’
spin is different when talking to environmentalists.
For example, in Eureka, where taking water from
Klamath farmers is popular, the Times Standard
quotes a major architect of the KBRA as stating
“there are no guarantees of water for farms in the
agreement, only a cap on how much can be diverted,”
a decidedly different story than the “water
guarantees” Klamath County residents hear about.
Instead, water
marketing dollars are the primary thing agriculture
is getting out of KBRA. A few farmers have made a
lot of money selling water, including pumping large
wells that are threatening other farm and domestic
wells. The KBRA provides in excess of $100 million
for various water marketing schemes.
Voters have an
excellent opportunity to reject the spin and to make
their voices heard by voting yes on Measure 18-80.
Klamath County should pull out of the KBRA and take
a strong stand against it.
Editor’s note:
Edward Bartell is a former Klamath County rancher who
was active in water issues, especially in efforts to get
low-cost power guarantees for ranchers and farmers.