KBRA still waiting for federal
legislation
Parts of the agreement can proceed under existing funding
and laws, supporters say
By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff Writer
Three months after stakeholders,
including two governors and a top federal official, signed the Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement, work continues to implement it and a
related Klamath River dam removal deal.
But until there’s federal
legislation and millions of dollars in funding, there’s only so much
that can be done.
“I wouldn’t say it’s in a holding
pattern,” said Paul Simmons, attorney for Klamath Water Users
Association and its member irrigation districts, “but the whole effort
can’t land until there’s federal
legislation.”
The agreement aims to resolve water
conflicts in the Klamath River Basin between irrigators, tribes,
fisheries and conservationists. It also advocates removal of four
Klamath River dams to provide fish passage.
Stakeholders signed the restoration
and dam removal agreements in February, ending years of closed-door
negotiations and talks.
Now, those stakeholders are focused
on implementing the documents, said Ed Sheets, a consultant originally
hired to facilitate negotiations. He
is now working with stakeholders on implementation.
The KBRA out-lines what needs to be
done in the next few years, and much of it is administrative and
preparatory.
Among those provisions is formation
of the Klamath Basin Coordinating Council, the body charged with
overseeing implementation of drought and fishery plans for the region.
Scientific studies required to
determine whether four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River should
come out are under way, Simon said. The actual decision isn’t due until
mid-2012.
State and federal officials are also
drafting an environmental impact report and scheduling public meetings
on the KBRA.
“This signals the beginning of the
scientific and legal reviews mandated by the national Environmental
Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act,” a press
release said.
Greg Addington, executive director
of Klamath Water Users Association, said there is draft legislation
being circulated among the stakeholders, but it’s not likely it would be
introduced in Congress this year.
“There are people in Washington who
are interested in (the
legislation) and in what it says,” Simmons said.
Sheets said there is plenty for the
stakeholders to do in the
meantime.
“I think it’s my hope
that some things can proceed under existing authority and funding,” he
said.
About
the restoration agreement
It would cost roughly $1.5 billion
to implement all aspects of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement and
its related dam removal agreement.
Among its key provisions:
•
Removing four hydroelectric dams, owned by PacifiCorp, pending
studies to determine feasibility of removal. Removal would improve
passage for anadromous fish species.
• Establishing sustainable water
supplies and affordable power rates for irrigators.
•
Helping the Klamath Tribes acquire a 92,000-acre parcel of
private timberland called the Mazama Tree Farm.
• Providing funding for habitat
restoration and economic development throughout the region.
Public
scoping sessions planned
Federal and state
officials will host public meetings regarding the Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement as part of the scientific and legal review of the
document. Following are the times, dates and locations of the meetings:
July 7 10 a.m. to 1
p.m., Copco Community Center in Montague
6 p.m. to 9 p.m., Yreka
Community Center in Yreka
July 8 6 p.m. to 9
p.m., Klamath County Fairgrounds in Klamath Falls
July 9 6 p.m. to 9
p.m., Chiloquin Community Center in Chiloquin
July 13 6 p.m. to 9
p.m., Chetco Activities Center in Brookings
July 14 6 p.m. to 9
p.m., Arcata Community Center in Arcata
July 15 6 p.m. to 9
p.m., Karuk Tribe Community Room in Orleans
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml