GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
Strength in numbers apparent
KBRA talks thought to be reason behind assistance levels
By JILL AHO
H&N Staff Writer
June 8, 2010
Local water
advocates said they believe negotiations that resulted
in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, a document
that seeks to settle water disputes in the Klamath
Basin, are the reason that Klamath Reclamation Project
irrigators are getting federal financial assistance.
Becky Hyde, a
consultant to Sustainable Northwest and a participant in
KBRA negotiations, recently spoke to members of the
Langell Valley and Horsefly irrigation districts because
the members were largely left out of KBRA discussions.
Independence
“I think they
appreciate their independence,” Hyde said. “They are not
related to some of the issues the rest of us are related
to. I can understand why they choose to stay out of
those conversations.”
But, Hyde said, the
strength in banding together to protect the Basin’s
interests is apparent this year.
“Just to be honest,
the reason that anybody in the Basin is getting dollars
this year has a lot to do with the KBRA family in full
swing trying to take care of irrigated agriculture this
summer,” Hyde said. “We need to be pulling together as
an agricultural community across the Basin to deal with
these drought issues. There shouldn’t be division.”
KBRA opponent Tom
Mallams said he believes there is validity in the idea
that without the KBRA negotiations, financial relief may
not have come to the Basin this year.
“It would have been
absolute insanity for them to not give (Project
irrigators) anything this year,” Mallams said. “Sure,
they can work with everybody, but they can work with
everybody without the KBRA in place.”
Greg Addington,
executive director of the Klamath Water Users
Association, said this year illustrates how important
having a plan is for the years when there simply isn’t
enough water to go around.
“It’s not the last
time it is going to be dry here,” Addington said. “The
Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement lines out, ‘Here’s
how we’re going to live with a certain amount of water
in any given year.’ Starting in March, you know what the
situation is, not May and June.”
Politics,
precipitation
Mallams countered
that the KBRA does nothing to change the Endangered
Species Act or biological opinions that dictate water
for fish, and said he believes this year’s drought is
more about politics than it is about a lack of
precipitation.
“(Assistance) has
always been an option. It was an option in 2001. The
government chose not to do it,” Mallams said. “The water
shouldn’t have been shut off in 2001. It should not have
been shut off this year. There is no drought in place
right now. It’s caused by politics, not because we’re
short on water.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml