Klamath
agriculture sales up and down in 2005
Agricultural sales in Klamath County saw ups and downs in 2005, a report
shows.
Potato sales were up by an estimated 34 percent, and cattle, the county and
state’s No. 1 commodity, saw a slight increase of 4 percent. Grains as a
whole in the county, including wheat, barley, oats and rye, saw a decrease 16
percent.
Klamath County dropped from eighth to ninth place in the state for
agricultural sales, contributing $201 million to the state’s $4.1 billion total.
Marion County came in first with $540 million in sales.
Cattle came in first for agricultural sales in Klamath County once again,
earning nearly $72.6 million, an increase of 4 percent from 2004. Record-level
prices have been seen for the last three years or so, motivated by a change in
consumer diet with a trend toward highprotein consumption, according to Ron
Hathaway, staff chair of the Klamath County Extension Service.
“It was sort of a change in attitude about diets and it was OK to eat beef
again,” Hathaway said.
A change in diet has been reflected in the restaurant industry, too, Hathaway
said.
“The demand has been there for the higher-end products — and we consume
lots of hamburger in this country,” Hathaway said. “The
demand for beef has been really strong.”
It was a record-breaking year for the state with an increase of 5 percent from
2004, with the highest annual agricultural earnings estimate
recorded since Oregon State University Extension Service began compiling the
data three decades ago.
“While breaking the $4 billion mark is noteworthy, 2005 can best be
described as a good but not necessarily great year for Oregon agriculture,”
said Larry Burt, an OSU Extension economist and the primary author and
coordinator of the annual report.
“Price instability and market volatility depressed earnings in some sectors
of the farm and ranch economy,” Burt added. “On the other hand, several
commodities enjoyed significant growth in value of sales in 2005.”
Grain growers throughout the state have been trying to balance acreage with
commodity prices.
“A statewide average yield for grain crops of 61 bushels per acre — the
best in four years — was more than offset
by a statewide decline in grain acreage of more than 5 percent to about
856,000 acres,” Burt said. “On top of this, wheat prices sank to the
lowest level in four years to $3.50 per bushel.”
Potato producers saw the steepest rise in sales with a 34 percent increase
from 2004. An estimated increase of $3 per hundredweight was seen for Klamath
County growers.
Part of the driving force behind higher sales was fewer potatoes. Acreage was
reduced from 2004, and yields were down, too. Land used to grow potatoes was
reduced by 1,350 acres, for 4,600 acres total, and yields were down by 30
hundredweight per acre.
Weather played a large part in reducing yields.
“Last year we had a miserable April in terms of a wet, cold start and so it
got growers behind,” said Kerry Locke, row crop agent with the extension
service. “The growers that tried to force their potatoes in early generally
didn’t have the yield and quality that they would like to have had, and the
growers that kind of held off in terms of not trying to force their operations
early had a better yield and quality.”
Acreage has been reduced by growers throughout the Basin as part of a
nationwide cooperative, United Potato Growers of America. United has also been
coordinating distribution of the crop in an effort to keep extra potatoes from
glutting the market.
The Basin’s potato growers in the past have been at the mercy of the open
market, competing with largescale growers in Washington state and Idaho. The
market has changed for growers in the Basin, something that can be credited to
the cooperative efforts of potato growers nationwide through United, according
to Locke.
“I think we’re starting to see
some positive effects from that cooperative,” Locke said.
Throughout the state an increase of only 3 percent in potato sales was
realized. Potatoes ranked 10th in the state for gross dollar sales out of 79
commodities tracked.
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml