Klamath water, fish and ecosystem

Officials search for best restoration method


By Gerry Baksys
H&N Staff Writer
May 5, 2006
    Rehabilitating the Klamath Basin ecosystem is about more than saving the sucker fish. 

    During the second of four public affairs TV programs, four of the scientists who are researching how to restore the Upper Klamath ecosystem, stabilize the recovery of the endangered sucker fish and find a way to provide for the reliability of water issues said that the trick is finding a solution that is both economical and beneficial to the environment. The programs are sponsored by Educational Solutions and the Oregon Institute of Technology. 

 

H&N photo by John Stoops
LEFT TO RIGHT: Harry Carlson of the Intermountain Research and Extension Center, Mark Buettner of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Terry Morton of Cascade Quality Solutions, Bob Gearheart from Humboldt State University and Larry Dunsmoor from the Klamath Tribes discuss the ecosystem on the Upper Klamath and the best way to restore it at Thursday evening’s public affairs TV program.

    From each side 

    “We have to fix the river and fix it for the people that live right there and use it,” said Larry Dunsmoor, representing the Klamath Tribes. “That is one of our biggest challenges. We might be able to make the river perfect, but we might make it perfect in ways that don’t work for a person that lives there. And if we can’t do that, then restoration will never work.” 

    A difficulty that often arises, said Harry Carlson of the Intermountain Research and Extension Center, is that the group has limited funds and a lot of work to do. 

    “What we try to concentrate on is what will have the biggest impact with a limited amount of funding,” Carlson said. “So we focus on a few things. The first is water quality, the second is habitat restoration for the fish. We also focus on the Upper Klamath Lake and the Sprague River, areas that can show improvement over a short period of time.” 

    Mark Buettner from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said that fixing anything becomes difficult because there are so many demands on such a limited supply of water. 

    “First we have to realize that some things are out of our control,” Buettner said. “First, we have relatively low precipitation that we deal with on an annual basis (13 inches). So we are starting from a relatively low quantity of water. Another thing is we have to deal with drought conditions, and that makes it more difficult to balance our water needs.” 

    Bob Gearheart from Humboldt State University said one of the best things the group can do to fix the water quality of the lake and help the sucker fish is to rehabilitate some of the former wetland areas. 

    “Fringe areas around the lake become important for a lot of reasons,” Gearheart said. From a water quality standpoint, the wetlands trap sediment, remove phosphorous, reduce temperatures and function as a fish habitat, he said.
 
 
 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Source:  http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/

heraldandnews/navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews