Walking wetlands - More acreage added to land rotation program


By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff Writer
September 14, 2006

H&N photos by Ty Beaver Sid Staunton of Staunton Farms discusses the benefits of the “walking wetlands” program to land he and his brothers are farming this season.


    TULELAKE — For Klamath Basin farmers and agencies that maintain the area’s wetlands, there is no downside.
    After nearly a decade of success on wildlife refuges at Tulelake and Lower Klamath Lake, government officials and Klamath Basin farmers hope a program to rotate wetlands and farmland will gain acceptance for use on private lands for its ability to aid agriculture as well as the environment.
    “What we’re doing is holistic resource management,” said Mike Green of the Bureau of Reclamation Klamath Falls office.
    Officials with the Tulelake National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau began instituting the flood fallow or “walking wetlands” program in the late 1990s, rotating 500 to 700 acres of the refuge’s lease lands between agricultural use to wetland use for periods of two to four years. Currently, more than 1,500 acres are now in rotation for a four-year period, and the refuge plans to have 2,100 acres or 10 percent of the lease lands in rotation by 2008.
    The increase in lands in rotation is because of interest in the program, said Dave Mauser, wildlife biologist with the Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuge. When the program first started, one farmer would bid to lease previously flooded lands. The most recent land had 10 bidders, and went for nearly $200 per acre, when, before flooding, the lands would go for around $70 an acre.
    For farmers, the high price is worth the benefit. Because of the duration of flooding, the land can be used for either conventional or organic farming, since no pesticides were applied during the wetland years.
    Higher yields
    Flooding the land also appears to suppress pests and diseases, such as white rot, nematodes and rhizock. Most importantly, yields and quality are higher, with or without fertilizer.
    Sid Staunton and his brothers of Staunton Farms have been using lease lands in the program since the program began at Tulelake. The earliest fields they use were converted back from wetlands six years ago and today they still see yields above their averages.
    “It just freshens the ground,” he said.
    The refuges have also benefited from the program. Bird populations have increased dramatically, both in already established species and new ones, such as shore birds. More wetlands have become available, thus increasing the viable habitat and water quality. The potential for increased water storage during winter months is another possible benefit.
    With so many advantages to both farmers and the environment, there is a push for private lands to begin a similar pilot program. Staunton and his brothers are using one of the fields they farm as a demonstration. At the refuge on Lower Klamath Lake, farmer Mike Noonan will flood his fields for a period in exchange for the ability to farm an equal amount of acres on the refuge.
    Challenges
    Hurdles do exist for a private lands program, though.
    The biggest obstacle is solving the problem of third party impact. Dikes between flooded and unflooded private lands could break and the issue of liability needs to be answered. The dike for Staunton’s demonstration field broke when it first flooded, and while little damage was done, it did make Staunton and the agencies working with him face the problem.
    The need for water to flood lands also is an issue. On the lease lands and refuges, the BOR provides the needed water, often a little more than three acre-feet per acre. On private lands, the allocation of irrigation water for a farmer’s land could be used for flooding, but that does not include the winter months when irrigation districts shut water supplies off or during a dry year when water use is rationed and restricted.
    Despite challenges, both farmers and government agencies see the use of “walking wetlands” as a beneficial way to continue agriculture while protecting the environment. The fact that people from both sides of the issue are actively talking about and endorsing such a project is a sign of its potential success, said Ron Cole with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
    “We are here right now because it works,” he said.
Klamath Pearl potatoes grown by Staunton Farms on previously flooded farmland in the “walking wetlands” program at the Tulelake National Wildlife Refuge.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Source:  http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/

navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews