He believes it indicates
the company is seriously considering
removing or transferring ownership
of its four hydroelectric dams on
the Klamath River.
“I don’t know if it’s a
likely possibility, but PacifiCorp
is getting significant pressure from
the president and the two
governors,” said the Siskiyou County
supervisor.
Others involved in the
Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement
said they aren’t sure what role the
withdrawal plays in ongoing talks
about the dams. The company has said
withdrawing similar applications is
a common practice in dam
re-licensing efforts and that it
intends to resubmit one in the
future, possibly unchanged.
Water quality
certification is necessary for
PacifiCorp to continue using the
dams, which are a key component of
the agreement.
Proponents want them removed to
restore passage for migratory fish
and aid habitat restoration.
Released Jan. 15
Released Jan. 15, the
agreement also calls for a variety
of other projects and actions to
allocate water among Klamath River
Basin communities, including money
to help pay for purchase of private
land for the Klamath Tribes and
establishment of a stable power rate
for irrigators.
Cook said he feels it’s
become federal and state policy to
advocate dam removal, a position he
is against. The Siskiyou County
Board of Supervisors voted not to
endorse the settlement agreement,
specifically because it seeks dam
removal.
Removing the dams would
have several consequences, Cook
said, including putting more strain
on California’s energy grid because
Siskiyou County would have to bring
in power rather than use power
generated by the dams.
Klamath County
Commissioner John Elliott and
Klamath Tribes council member Jeff
Mitchell said they couldn’t comment
on how the application withdrawal
would play out though they know
talks are ongoing.
“It
indicates that they are dialing in,
but we’re anxious to see where it
goes,” Mitchell said.