35-year adjudication process nearing end
The saying goes,
whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting.
For more than 35
years water stakeholders in the Klamath Basin have
been fighting for water in court as part of Klamath
Basin Adjudication.
Tens of millions
of dollars, 730 water claims, 5,600 contests to
those claims, and 724 settlements later, the Basin
is nearing a landmark: at the end of the year, a
judge likely will give a final order of
determination, establishing water rights for permit
holders and for the first time giving the Oregon
Water Resources Department the authority to regulate
Basin water.
But that order
won’t end the fighting, those involved predict.
“I’ve been
involved in adjudication since I graduated from law
school,” said Bill Ganong, attorney for the
adjudication contestants on the Klamath Reclamation
Project. “My father said adjudication would not be
completed in his lifetime. He was right; he passed
away in 2005.
“I’m confident
adjudication will not be completed in my lifetime.”
Representatives
from the Oregon Water Resources Department, the
Klamath Tribes, Upper Klamath Water Users, and
Klamath Reclamation Project contestants on Thursday
gave their perspectives on the adjudication process.
The talk was the
first of PROSPER’s Klamath Conversations speaker
series. Upper Basin contestants who were affected by
the most recent adjudication in December declined to
offer a representative, organizers said.
Regardless of
how a judge decides on individual claims, the Basin
as a whole will change dramatically
once it becomes
an adjudicated basin.
“It’s quite a
milestone we’re coming to at the end of 2012,” said
Doug Woodcock, representative from the Oregon Water
Resources Department. “Things are going to change in
the Klamath Basin as far as how water is managed.
“Before
(adjudication) we hadn’t really had anything to
regulate for or against. After this decision, the
Klamath Basin is going to be like the other basins,
where water is regulated on a priority date.”
How adjudication
could impact local irrigators
Doug Woodcock at
one point was an assistant watermaster for the
Oregon Water Resources Department in the Grants Pass
area, which has long been adjudicated.
There, after certain weather conditions, he expected
a call from the most senior water right holder. When
he drove out to the site, people along the canal
would see him and begin shutting off, he said.
“They’d been
doing it for so many years, they knew where they
stood in order of priority,” he said. “Everybody
understands the rules, it’s easy.
“That’s in an
adjudicated basin. In an unadjudicated basin …
nobody knows. It’s going to take time to do this.
It’s not an overnight process. It’s a steep learning
curve.”
Local irrigators
haven’t gone through the experience of having their
water shut off so their neighbor can irrigate, but
they expected it wouldn’t be pleasant, especially in
the context of the Klamath Tribes, who have a
beginning of time priority date.
So for decades irrigators have been
in court.
Becky Hyde, a rancher near Beatty, said a fellow
rancher with land on the Williamson River said he
“could have bought and sold his land three times
over based on the money he put into … litigation
against the Tribes.”
The Tribes
responded, claiming the water was assured to them in
the Treaty of
1864, in which the federal government bought land
from native tribes but did not formally take away
hunting, fishing and gathering rights. Since then,
courts have ruled tribes are entitled to those
rights, as well as the water that supports them.
A “time
immemorial” priority date makes the Tribes the most
senior water right holders.
“It still
matters in 2012 that native people were here first,”
said Bud Ullman, attorney for the Tribes. “First in
time, first in right.”
After the final
orders, the Tribes will be able to make a call on
the amount of water specified in adjudication for
their land, mostly the former Klamath Reservation,
but affecting other water bodies.
The Klamath
Reclamation Project, with a 1905 priority date, also
will be able to make calls on junior users upstream,
said Bill Ganong, attorney for Project contestants.
“The Project has
the last straw in the river. They’ve gotten what was
left over year after year, and they have the
(Endangered Species Act) on top of that,” Ganong
said, referring to the protected status of two fish
in the lake and river from which the Project
irrigates.
“With
adjudication, that’s going to turn around somewhat,”
he said. “They’re not going to be the last straw in
the river.”
How an adjudicated Basin would work
Western water law is based on a simple principle:
first in time, first in right.
In
practice, that principle is complicated and
controversial, ultimately pitting neighbor against
neighbor when a senior priority calls a water right
that shuts off junior water rights upstream, said
Upper Klamath rancher Becky Hyde.
Water adjudication to some may seem like an odd
method to manage water — an adjudication judge
decides a water permit holder’s priority date and
the amount of water they’re assured, potentially at
the expense of junior water right holders, who are
last in line to get their water allotment.
But
without it, proponents say, water — a public
resource — is a free-for-all.
“The
Klamath Basin not being adjudicated meant the most
senior water right holders could not enforce their
right,” said Tom Paul, deputy director of Oregon
Water Resources Department. “They did not have the
ability to call the watermaster and say ‘I’m out of
water.’ ”
“This is all set up to protect the senior user,”
added Doug Woodcock, a representative with the
department.
Once
a senior water right holder makes a call to the
local watermaster, in this region Scott White, the
watermaster:
2.
Develops a distribution list of people and water
bodies, figuring out how to get junior water to the
senior user.
3.
Investigates for unauthorized diversions.
4.
Assesses supply and demand — how short is the senior
water right holder?
5.
Finds the target priority date, determining which
upstream dates are subject to shut off.
6.
“Regulates off” — shuts off — junior water
diversions.
7.
Re-evaluates to turn on junior diversions when
possible.
“This is new to you. You’re an unadjudicated basin
about to become adjudicated,” Woodcock said. “Once
the basin is adjudicated, water rights are sorted
out and everybody has their piece of paper that says
what their water right is … (a senior water right
holder) will make a call to the watermaster that
they’re out of water.”
The
watermaster is to go through the process as quickly
as possible, Paul said. “We need to be timely. If a
senior water holder has a crop in the ground, we
need to get that water to them.”
Since the Basin has been unadjudicated, White
doesn’t yet have the staff to manage calls,
especially in a poor water year when a mass of calls
could occur.
Klamath County commissioners Al Switzer and Cheryl
Hukill said the county’s financial contribution to
support the watermaster won’t be cut. Other funding
comes from the state.