Pending water
shortage has far-reaching impacts
Talking to the governor: Residents
testify about drought’s impact, needs of Basin
Klamath Falls Herald and News
Klamath
County Sheriff Tim Evinger did not speak at
Tuesday’s hearing with Gov. Ted Kulongoski, but
observed the proceedings and talked about
contingency plans if irrigators face a water
shutoff.
“ Frankly, we
don’t expect any problems but you always plan for
the worst,” Evinger said.
He said he and
other law enforcement officials have met with U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation law enforcement managers,
which did not exist in 2001 during the Klamath Basin
water crisis. Evinger said Reclamation’s law
enforcement unit was partly created because of the
2001 crisis.
Sue Fry, the
Klamath area manager for the federal Bureau of
Reclamation, viewed a portion of Tuesday’s hearing
with Gov. Ted Kulongoski by a video feed from an
adjacent meeting room. She was among the federal
officials
who met with the governor and his staff earlier in
the day.
“The only thing
I can say for sure is it’s going to be a tough
year,” she said of allocations to water users, which
have yet to be determined. Fry gave no indication on
when that decision would be made.
“We are doing
everything we can to be flexible within the limits
of our guidelines,” she said, referring to federal
requirements to provide water for endangered fish
species.
She said the
process to create the Klamath Basin Restoration
Agreement, which has been signed by stakeholders but
not yet approved or funded by Congress, was
positive.
“It’s very
different than what would have happened even four
years ago,” Fry said, referring to cooperative
efforts between irrigators, tribes and commercial
fishermen.
Before 2001,
Floyd A. Boyd Co. primarily sold equipment to those
growing row crops in the Klamath Basin, including
potatoes. That has changed since the 2001 water
crisis, when irrigation water was shut off to
Klamath Project irrigators.
“The potatoes in
this valley have dried up. We had to reinvent
ourselves,” said Donnie Boyd, who is the third
generation of his family to own the business.
On Tuesday, Boyd
told Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski that the business
is again in peril because of the uncertainty of
irrigation water for the Klamath Reclamation
Project. He has 72 employees, and some are only
working three days a week because of the water
situation.
Admitting it was
an emotional issue, Boyd said aid for farmers and
producers would help him somewhat. But, he added,
there still isn’t direct aid for third parties who
support the agricultural community.
Boyd said he
doesn’t want loans — he already has more debt than
he did nine years ago — but he believes something
needs to be done to help his business and others
stay afloat.
In 2008, Klamath
County’s agricultural economy produced $300 million
in gross farm sales, which derive from the sale of
agricultural products. In 2009, that number was down
$59 million as a result of the economic recession.
Willie Riggs
said a water shutoff to the Project would only
exacerbate the effects of the recession, as
agriculture is only second to the timber industry in
importance to the county’s economy.
The economic
activity of the agricultural community creates jobs
within it but also in other aspects of the county’s
economy. By Riggs’ figures, about 4,550 jobs in the
county were a direct or indirect result of the
county’s
agricultural activity. This doesn’t include other
aspects of the agricultural economy, such as food
processors.
Dave Solem said
repeating 2001 would be the last straw for many in
the Basin’s irrigator community.
But that appears
to be where the region is headed. With a drought
looming, Solem told Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski his
irrigation district is unsure how much water will be
available for irrigators. Upper Klamath Lake is at
record low levels, and Clear Lake and Gerber
Reservoir are depleted from a water shortage last
year.
He said it would
help if the state could help pay for operation and
maintenance of the irrigation district for
irrigators, as they find it unfair to pay for
services when they’re not receiving water. At the
same time, government needs to do more to ensure
these circumstances don’t occur in the future.
“ We are doing our part, but to allow
our farmers to be bankrupted because of drought mis-management
is unreasonable,” he said.
Dave Cacka, business owner and president
of KID board
of directors
Dave
Cacka says everything in the Basin is interrelated.
When farmers can’t get water, they
don’t raise crops. When farmers don’t grow crops,
his potato processing plant doesn’t operate.
If
that happens, the 48 people who work for him — which
include people of various ethnicities and
backgrounds — are out of work and unable to pay
bills or fill their needs.
The
impacts of a shutoff this year would also have more
long-term impacts. He raised potatoes himself for 30
years before the 2001 water crisis.
“Because of 2001, I no longer raise them,” Cacka
told Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski
, adding he also sold his applicator business
because of the water shutoff nine years ago.
John
Elliott, Klamath County commissioner
Elliott says the county is already making plans to
extend what it can to area irrigators who could be
impacted by a water shortage, including having the
assessor provide a tax break to those landowners.
But he told Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski by phone Tuesday that the
region also needs understanding of its situation,
and that it is unacceptable that the Klamath
Reclamation Project must be the thing that gives
when there’s not enough water. Elliott called on the
development of Long Lake into a deepwater storage
facility that would be a boon in the future.
“We’ll have the opportunity to set aside that water
for the inevitable dry years,” he said.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section
107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml