GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
Pollution plan under review
Oregon’s plan for Klamath River submitted to
EPA
By SARA
HOTTMAN
H&N
Staff Reporter
January
5, 2010
The
final pollution reduction plan for the
Klamath River in Oregon is nearly identical
to the draft that drew scathing criticism
from Klamath County leaders, irrigators and
others who said the proposed requirements —
particularly for phosphorous — would cost
between $12 million and $200 million to
implement.
Oregon
DEQ last week submitted the final plan for
the Klamath River to the federal
Environmental Protection Agency for
approval, expected by Jan. 20.
DEQ
officials during public meetings and in
written responses said they understood the
cost burden, but had to fulfill federal
requirements in the Clean Water Act.
Downstream first
The EPA
approved California’s plan last week.
Klamath
Falls city officials told federal officials
that establishing downstream pollution loads
first forced the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality to reduce upstream
loads to nearly unattainable levels.
The
plans, called total maximum daily loads, or
TMDLs, regulate how much pollution sources
like municipal wastewater treatment
facilities can release into water bodies
each day.
Reducing pollution
Oregon’s
Klamath River TMDL regulates phosphorous ,
nitrogen, biological oxygen demand and
temperature. The biggest problem for
stakeholders is the phosphorous allocation;
the order requires a 91 percent reduction
from the current level.
Stakeholders say it naturally exists in
Upper Klamath Lake — 76 percent of the total
load comes from the lake, compared to 3
percent from the city — so filtering it to
the mandated degree is impossible.
The city already meets
biological oxygen demand requirements and
can meet nitrogen and temperature
requirements once it finishes planned
improvements to the wastewater treatment
facility.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without
profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving
this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For
more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml