|
Become a friend of the Klamath Bucket Brigade All donations are tax deductible |
|
This Website is Dedicated to Alvin Alexander Cheyne January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005 |
GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.
Power bill gets hearing
Bill
would increase PacifiCorp rates
to pay for removing 4 dams
Opponents who argue a bill to
raise power rates would open
the door to future unchecked
rate increases squared off
Tuesday with those who say the
bill prevents such abuses and
paves the way for resolving
ongoing Klamath Basin issues.
The Oregon Legislature’s Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee hosted its first hearing on Gov. Ted Kulongoski’s bill to raise $180 million to help pay for removal of four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River.
Supporters say the bill — which would increase power rates for PacifiCorp’s average Oregon customer by about $1.50 a month — is needed to implement the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement . They dismiss claims the legislation would expose ratepayers to increased financial liability if dam removal occurs.
Whitsett opposes
But opponents, including state Sen. Doug Whitsett, R -K amath Falls, have said the bill leaves ratepayers on the hook and criticize it for making Oregonians pay for removal of three dams in California. The fourth dam, J.C. Boyle, is in Klamath County.
Proponents include the Citizens’ Utility Board, a ratepayer advocacy group. Craig Tucker of the Karuk Tribe, said the state’s Public Utilities Commission will be required to review the bill even if it is approved by the state Legislature.
“We feel so confident that this is the best deal, we have no problem with that,” he said.
Open to increases
But Whitsett contends the bill’s wording leaves ratepayers open to further rate increases, possibly as high as $35 to $ 65 per month, while also pointing out that the full cost of dam removal is not yet known.
Tucker countered charges the bill was flawed, saying opposition is more due to an ideological opposition to dam removal itself.
The restoration agreement allocates water in the Klamath River Basin among irrigators, conservationists, tribes and fisheries.
Dam removal is key component and must happen for it to be implemented.
A group of stakeholders, state and federal officials and representatives from PacifiCorp reached a tentative dam removal agreement in November. They have until July 1 to hammer out a final agreement, with dam removal beginning no later than the year 2020.
Kulongoski promised he’d bring about the legislation during the current legislative session that would direct the state’s Public Utility Commission to raise PacifiCorp’s rates to pay for dam removal.
California bonds
The $ 180 million,
along with $20 million from
PacifiCorp’s ratepayers in other
states, will be combined with
$250 million in voter approved
bonds from the state of
California to help pay for dam
removal.
PacifiCorp has said that the increase would raise the average Oregon customer’s bill by about $1.50 a month. Agricultural power users would see about a 2-percent increase in their bill.
If dam removal does not take place, the money would be returned to ratepayers.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml