Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.

 

 

 

 

      

 

Pro-agriculture groups are not in support of KBRA
 
Klamath Falls Herald and News
Letter to the Editor
May 7, 2010
 

   Those who negotiated the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement want you to accept the demolition of four fully functional hydropower dams that provide flood protection along with continual reduced historical water allocations to basin agriculture as a successful negotiation tactic.

 

    The KBRA explicitly states in section 19.1 “Nothing here is intended to limit the applicability or effect of the Endangered Species Act or other Applicable Law.”    Under section 19.4.5, the entire deal will be renegotiated when “Adaptive management of water resources consistent with the obligations of this Agreement is deemed by the Klamath Basin Coordinating Council to be insufficient to address the impacts of climatic change.”

    Easily 10 out of 18 of that self-appointed Klamath Basin Coordinating Council membership are government bureaucracies, tribes and radical environmentalists whose actions of listing endangered fish have resulted in the 2001 and 2010 water shortages.

    Klamath County commissioners argue that they support the agreements because they are “pro-agriculture.” 

    The Oregon Cattlemen’s Association is “pro-agriculture” and its “members heard presentations on the agreement from the Klamath Water Users Association and the Klamath Off-Project Water Users at its board meeting Feb. 15.  Afterward, the board voted unanimously to oppose the agreement.” (Feb 22, 2008 Herald and News)

    The Siskiyou County Cattlemen’s and Cattlewomen’s associations, Water for Life, 14 California granges, all understand the agreements are bad for agriculture.

    Some argue that you’re racist if you oppose taxpayer dollars being spent to purchase land for the Klamath Tribes. Yet the signers of the KBRA banned the Shasta Indian Nation (whose burial grounds shall be damaged by dam removal) from the negotiations.  The Shasta Indians oppose dam removal.

    Conservatives such as the California Republican Party County Chairman’s Association oppose the liberal agenda of tearing out these beneficial dams.

    Conservatives, cowboys and Indians oppose the liberal KBRA and dam removal agreements.

    Brandon Criss

    Rancher/farmer

    Chairman, Siskiyou County Republican Party


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Source:  http://www.heraldandnews.com/viewpoints/article_b2a6da5a-5973-11df-9931-001cc4c002e0.html