The National Marine Fisheries Service
hasn’t submitted a final biological opinion on operation of the Project
and wants to work with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to develop ways to protect the endangered fish species,
the letter said. The letter discussed the National Marine Fisheries
Service draft biological opinion. The full report is not yet public.
Without a biological opinion yet this growing season, Reclamation
officials say they will stick with prior standards.
But portions of the new draft hint at future issues, including a
finding that operating the Project may be negatively impacting killer
whales in the Pacific Ocean.
“It’s ridiculous. What’s next for us? Polar bears, Siberian tigers,
African rhinos? ” said Greg Addington, executive director of Klamath
Water Users Association, in an e-mail.
Biological opinions inform Reclamation officials how to run the
Project without adversely affecting fish species or habitat.
Reclamation requested new biological opinions from U.S. Fish and
Wildlife and the National Marine Fisheries Service last summer because
of technical errors in documents and new data regarding environmental
impacts of the Project.
Previous opinion
Fish and Wildlife officials submitted an opinion regarding Upper
Klamath Lake and the Lost River and shortnose suckers in early April.
Their report said the fish would not be negatively impacted by the
Project.
Christine Karas, deputy area manager for Reclamation, said National
Marine Fisheries Service hasn’t submitted its final report. The delay
and the state of water supplies in the Klamath Basin this year mean that
any findings from the report will not be instituted this year.
“We feel like we’re in pretty good shape, waterwise,” she said.
Russ Strach, an assistant regional administrator with NMFS said it is
unclear how the agency’s report would impact future irrigation. The
letter suggests increased river flows in certain water years may be
necessary, but does not make recommendations on how to protect coho
salmon.
“I honestly don’t know the outcome,” Strach said.
Fisheries Service representatives are meeting with Reclamation and
USFW officials in the coming months to develop specific actions. Curt
Mullis, U.S. Fish and Wildlife field supervisor, said recommendations
are being sought internally. Karas said she expected a final document by
next spring.
Irrigators also are evaluating the draft opinion to see what their
next step should be. Addington said there should be no concern this
year, thanks to the late wet weather.
Russ Strach, an assistant regional
administrator with NMFS said his agency began looking into impacts on
killer whales after data from the Columbia River showed that hydropower
activity was leading to declines in Chinook salmon.
Christine Karas, deputy area manager with U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,
said she was surprised killer whales were mentioned as being impacted by
the Project. But, she added, chinook salmon are a primary food source
for the endangered whales and impacts to their food sources require
investigation.
Karas said there are potential legal issues because chinook
hatcheries are below Iron Gate Dam on the Klamath River and on the
Trinity River. However, not all varieties of chinook salmon are
threatened, and that includes those coming from the Klamath River
system, she said.