|
|
![]() |
| Photo courtesy of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Salmon fishermen display their catch at the |
Q:
Who would benefit from the return of salmon?
A:
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife District Fish Biologist Roger
Smith said the benefits of salmon and other anadromous (able to migrate
from salt to fresh water) fish returning to the
Larry
Dunsmoor, research biologist for the Klamath Tribes, said the return of
salmon is good for anyone who likes fish and rivers. “People who like
to fish will, at some point, see a thriving steelhead and Chinook salmon
fishery south of Keno,” he said.
Beyond
the return of migratory species, which is fairly certain with dam
removal, Dunsmoor said, the dam removal could help to encourage a
resident trout fishery between Keno and the J.C. Boyle Reservoir. That
fishery is already outstanding, he said, but passage problems created by
the dam diminish the fishing.
Dunsmoor
focused his comments on the improvements to fisheries below Keno because
those were the most certain for rapid improvements. He was also
optimistic about the return of coho salmon above the lake. It would just
take more time for those fisheries to return.
Chuck
Bonham, Trout Unlimited legal counsel, said returning salmon to their
historical habitat in the upper Basin would improve the overall health
of the species. Healthy fisheries would mean fewer regulatory
restrictions, he said.
Salmon
in
“Of
course, there is no question returning salmon would benefit coastal
fishing communities and economies in
Q:
What does the science say on the issue of whether anadromous fish came
up into the
A:
“The information is overwhelming, and this matter does not deserve to
be called an ‘issue’ simply because some people refuse to
acknowledge the well-documented history,” said Klamath Tribes attorney
Bud Ullman. He said salmon historically ran up at least the Sprague and
Williamson rivers. Photographs, Indian and non-Indian histories,
anthropological and ethno-historical work, and other sources all reach
that conclusion, he said. There is a good compilation of the available
relevant information published in the scientific journal
“Fisheries,” April 2005, Vol. 30, No. 4.
The
agreement is very flexible in the species, timing and location of
restored fisheries because such things are very difficult to predict
with specificity, he said.
Siskiyou
County Commissioner Jim Cook said he has not seen any reports of salmon
in the upper Basin. “I have heard some agency people say that there
was but I don’t know where they got their information.”
Phil
Detrich, field supervisor for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said
there is some controversy, but also said there is evidence salmon were
found in the
Irma
Lagonmarsino from the National Marine Fisheries Service in
Q:
If the
A:
Phil Detrich, field supervisor for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
said studies indicate the dams and reservoirs worsen water quality, so
dam removal could improve water quality, which will benefit salmon.
Habitat improvement along
“The
quality of the water is deteriorating because of the dams,” and he
believes salmon populations will increase with water quality
improvements.
Ullman
said the hatchery operation will most likely be moved. Details regarding
the location and size of the hatchery have yet to be determined. The new
hatchery will likely be operated in a manner that lessens the impacts of
hatchery fish on wild fish.
“Remember
that with dam removal, extensive habitat areas will be re-opened to
salmon, and conditions in the
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews