Laurie Sada, Klamath Falls field
supervisor for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said Endangered
Species Act reviews are required every five years. The public is
invited to submit new information produced since 2007.
“We get a lot of comments, but
rarely do we get any information that would change the status of the
species,” Sada said, noting the goal is to get new science based
data. The comment period runs until July
25.

The Klamath Off-Project Water
Users opposes the endangered listing of the Lost River and shortnose
suckers, said Tom Mallams, president of the group.
He claimed that the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service does not have
the information it needs,
including historic numbers of suckers, current numbers and
projected numbers,
that could delist the fish.
“They have studied these fish
for decades and spent hundreds of thousands of dollars but we still
don’t have even basic information,” he said.
The shortnose sucker, listed as
an endangered species in 1988, is among 53 federally listed species
being reviewed in a district that includes the Klamath Basin and
areas of California and Nevada.
The other Klamath Basin species
on the list include the endangered Applegate’s milk-vetch, the
Northern spotted owl and bull trout, both listed as threatened; and
the Oregon spotted frog and fisher, both listed as candidate
species.
None were scheduled for this
cycle of the five year review.
Coho salmon, which are listed as
threatened under the Endangered Species Act, were not included on
the list because they are under the jurisdiction of the National
Marine Fisheries Service, which oversees ocean fish, including those
that swim upstream. Sada said the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
only has jurisdiction over freshwater fish.
Under the review process, new
information about the endangered suckers will be accepted until July
25. The Klamath Falls field office of Fish and Wildlife will review
the data and make recommendations . I f changes are recommended,
public hearings will be scheduled.
Five-year reviews are done “to
ensure the listing classification of a species as threatened or
endangered is accurate,” Sada said.
The sucker review will consider
scientific and other information available since the 2007 review.