Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.

 

 

 

 

      

 

 
River flows to increase for fish 
 

The decision not expected to hurt overall lake levels 

 

By SARA HOTTMAN

H&N Staff Reporter

February 9, 2011

 

     The Bureau of Reclamation will increase flows today on the Klamath River below the Iron Gate Dam to flush away disease-causing parasites from the fish population below the dam.

 

   Flows will be three times their current cubic feet per second rate, going from 1,600 cfs to 5,000 cfs for six hours, and then decreasing to 1,300 cfs.

 

   The increased flows are not expected to hurt irrigators, who want Upper Klamath Lake full at the beginning of April.

 

   “The lake’s in good shape right now,” said Greg Addington, director of the Klamath Water Users Association. “That’s a lot of water, but I don’t feel like the lake is in jeopardy of not filling because of it.”

 

   Tuesday afternoon the lake was at 4,141.9 feet. It must be at least 4,141.5 feet at the end of the month. But Jason Phillips, area manager for the Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Basin office, said he was concerned that a biological opinion requiring high flows from the lake down the Klamath River in the spring could prematurely lower lake levels.

 

   A complaint by PacifiCorp, parent company of Pacific Power, filed in January was the catalyst for the increased flows, according to Kevin Moore, spokesman for the Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Basin office.     

 

   The company said reduced flows could hurt its hydroelectric dam operation. PacifiCorp owns four dams on the Klamath River.

 

   “Once they lodged the complaint, the parties began to work toward its resolution,” Moore said. “Through the work of the (Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement) partners to resolve the complaint, it made the variable flows possible.”  

 

   Complaint filed

 

   In mid-January, PacifiCorp filed the complaint with the federal government, saying the Bureau didn’t provide adequate notice about reduced flows in the Klamath River as required in Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement. The company ’s four dams produce about 2 percent of Pacific Power’s hydroelectric power.

 

   In January, the Bureau’s Klamath Basin office said flows should remain low — between 1,100 and 1,300 cfs — through February.

 

   Parties involved in the KHSA convened their hydrologists and biologists and worked up variable flows that alleviated PacifiCorp’s complaint and were within the confines of the National Marine Fisheries Service biological opinion, Moore said.

 

   “They’re working together to accomplish the goals contained in the NMFS biological opinion and the need for PacifiCorp to provide power in the most efficient manner,” Moore said.

 

   The biological opinion protects endangered coho salmon in the Klamath River. It allows   for increased f low variability — from 1,300 cfs to nearly 5,000 cfs — in February.

 

   In this case, officials say higher flows will flush disease - causing parasites in the fish population below the Iron Gate Dam.

 

   The committee comprises hydrologists and biologists from the National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Reclamation, PacifiCorp and tribes.

 

   Moore said the committee is still looking at how long the reduced flows will last.

 

   “They’re still in discussions,” he said. “It’s a continuing effort by that team to determine what’s in the best interest of everyone involved — irrigators, salmon, suckers.”

 
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml