






|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
|
|

Stakeholders, administration officials meet
Balance sought in
water needs for rural, municipal, ecological uses
A group of stakeholders in the nation’s water supply —
farmers, businesses, municipalities, environmental agencies,
tribes — met with Obama administration officials last week in
Washington, D.C., to discuss recommendations on how to balance
municipal, rural and ecological water needs.
The
recommendations came from the Johnson Foundation Freshwater
Summit in June, where a group of 175 experts compiled a set of
problems and solutions with water management across the country
into a report called “Charting New Waters: A call to action to
address U.S. freshwater challenges.”
“It was an
example of really diverse interests coming together,” said Dan
Keppen, executive director of the Family Farm Alliance, an
advocacy group for Western farmers. “There are entities in this
report we have traditionally been adversaries with, but we came
together and found common ground . . . to find ways to
streamline the regulatory process when it comes to management in
water issues.”
Keppen, of Klamath Falls,
was among stakeholders invited to the meeting. One of the main
topics at the forum, he said, was the
need to better coordinate
water management between federal agencies.
Keppen used the Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement as “a specific example of where
innovative things were happening,”
coordinating water management among many stakeholders, in
particular the Klamath Reclamation Project management plan it
establishes.
Without the plan, one agency
required water for coho salmon in the Klamath River, another
required water for the sucker in Clear Lake Reservoir, and “by
the time that got done, there’s not enough water to take care of
irrigation needs,” Keppen said. “That’s happening across the
board.”
Farmers in
California’s Central Valley for years have suffered water
shortages because of environmental protection rulings. Three
years ago, a severe drought left Southern states fighting over
water, and urban areas in the West are increasingly worried
about keeping a sufficient water supply for economic and
population growth.
Report’s proposed water allocation solutions
The report offers solutions
on how to address water allocation issues:
• Improve coordination
of management across scales and sectors. Management systems are
currently overgrown, and need to be pared down to emphasize
state and local cooperation and management.
• Enhance effectiveness
of existing regulatory tools. Update and enhance current
regulatory tools — Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Farm Bill — so they address contemporary water issues.
• Promote efficient,
environmentally wise water management, use and delivery. Launch
a dedicated effort to research, develop and implement water
technology for energy and treatment to make water use more
efficient.
• Ensure decision-making
is based on sound science and data. Invest in streamlining data
gathering and analysis for consistent, accurate conclusions.
• Employ a long-range
adaptive approach to planning and management. Implement flexible
strategies so water stakeholders can adapt to constantly
changing conditions.
• Account for the full
cost of water, and invest in sustainable water infrastructure.
Water utilities and other water users should track and report
the full cost of their services and consumption to lead to
better understanding of the cost to obtain, treat and deliver
water.
• Educate the public
about challenges and solutions. Teach people about the role of
water in municipalities, agriculture and the ecosystem so they
can understand its importance.
• Develop and validate
methods for freshwater ecosystem services markets. Quantify the
benefits that lakes, rivers and wetlands provide, as well as the
cost of their detriment.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|