Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

 

 

        

Study the tradeoffs before removing dams    

 

Klamath Falls Herald and News Letter

May 19, 2008

 

   Regarding the May 11 editorial, “PacifiCorp and Dam Removal:” 


   It stated that the timber, agricultural, and fishing industry comprised a $2.5 billion annual industry, which dwarfed the one-time cost of dam removal. 


   Look at this from a purely economic view. The timber industry isn’t impacted by the flow or lack thereof of the
Klamath River and once the water in the river passes the Keno Dam it is lost to the Klamath Irrigation District. 


   That leaves only the fishing industry (salmon), which is on the order of $10 million to $20 million. The question: Let the water run into the ocean and hope it will revive the salmon industry, or generate $40-plus million worth of power annually and come up with improvements to help the salmon runs? To me the second alternative is much more appealing. 


   Remember the lessons we learned with the decline of the salmon along the coast. There is a good chance that the marine environment may no longer be capable of supporting historic salmon runs without help. 


   A second point: Why require removal of all the dams below Keno Dam as one consideration. All the dams have various points to consider. For example the J. C. Boyle Dam generates half the power on the
Klamath River and has a working fish ladder. The reservoir behind the dam provides a scenic area supporting much wildlife and recreation. 


   As for the other dams, the people in
California along the river have stood up against dam removal, so I will not make any comments about a situation they know better than I. 


   Where are the trade-off studies for each dam indicating the best options for each? What about the environmental impact studies? These are just a few of the questions that need to be answered before dam removal is considered. 


   John Turner
   
Klamath Falls  

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

Source:  http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/

navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews