The right
plan for Klamath dams
Department
of the Interior reports and public forums on the
Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement have
referenced “scientific studies” — thousands of
pages and figures designed to prove few real and
many imagined KBRA benefits. Bureaucrats,
scientists, and economists with majors in
creative writing spent millions to document
these benefits. The latest report even counts
“non-use benefits”, i.e. people living at the
other end of the country feeling good about the
KBRA! Benefits are “valued” at $15.6 billion.
What an insult to our intelligence! Let’s
simplify the KBRA to what it is:
Five special
interest groups (“stakeholders”) got together to
write their wish list:
•
Pacific Power wanted someone else to pay for dam
relicensing.
• Irrigators
wanted subsidized (“affordable”) power rates.
• Indian
tribes wanted 92,000 acres of timberland.
•
Environmentalists wanted the Klamath River
restored to original flow.
•
Commercial fishermen wanted more salmon.
None of the
stakeholders wanted to pay for their wishes. So,
they wrote a KBRA where ratepayers pay for
everything. The stakeholders agreed their KBRA
worked for them. The public realized they were
getting fleeced.
So, instead
of destroying the dams:
• Make
only limited dam upgrades to relicense. The
Environmental Protection Agency and Endangered
Species Act drop their unreal demands, and
Warren Buffett funds the limited upgrades.
• The
U.S. Agricultural Subsidy Program pays
irrigators a power subsidy.
• The
Bureau of Indian Affairs pays the tribes $21
million to buy their tree farm.
• The
environmental and commercial fishermen
organizations pay the added costs of any
additional dam modifications they want.
This
simplified KBRA would meet most stakeholder
wishes. One-time and recurring costs would be
dramatically lower, dam removal negatives
avoided, and nobody needs to invent phony
benefits to sell a $1.5 billion scam. There
would be lawsuits, but they will happen no
matter what is done.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without
profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For
more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml