Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.

 

 

 

 

      

 

The right plan for Klamath dams   

 

Herald and News

Letter to the Editor

February 1, 2012

 

   Department of the Interior reports and public forums on the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement have referenced “scientific studies” — thousands of pages and figures designed to prove few real and many imagined KBRA benefits. Bureaucrats, scientists, and economists with majors in creative writing spent millions to document these benefits. The latest report even counts “non-use benefits”, i.e. people living at the other end of the country feeling good about the KBRA! Benefits are “valued” at $15.6 billion. What an insult to our intelligence! Let’s simplify the KBRA to what it is:

 

   Five special interest groups (“stakeholders”) got together to write their wish list:

 

   Pacific Power wanted someone else to pay for dam relicensing.  

 

   • Irrigators wanted subsidized (“affordable”) power rates.

 

   Indian tribes wanted 92,000 acres of timberland.

 

   Environmentalists wanted the Klamath River restored to original flow.

 

   Commercial fishermen wanted more salmon.

 

   None of the stakeholders wanted to pay for their wishes. So, they wrote a KBRA where ratepayers pay for everything. The stakeholders agreed their KBRA worked for them. The public realized they were getting fleeced.  

 

   So, instead of destroying the dams:

 

   Make only limited dam upgrades to relicense. The Environmental Protection Agency and Endangered Species Act drop their unreal demands, and Warren Buffett funds the limited upgrades.

 

   The U.S. Agricultural Subsidy Program pays irrigators a power subsidy.

 

   The Bureau of Indian Affairs pays the tribes $21 million to buy their tree farm.

 

   The environmental and commercial fishermen organizations pay the added costs of any additional dam modifications they want.  

 

   This simplified KBRA would meet most stakeholder wishes. One-time and recurring costs would be dramatically lower, dam removal negatives avoided, and nobody needs to invent phony benefits to sell a $1.5 billion scam. There would be lawsuits, but they will happen no matter what is done.

 

   Svend Hoyer-Nielsen

 

   Klamath Falls

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml