Q: What challenges have you faced?
The spring and fall migrations of snow geese, white fronts and ducks increase the demand for food sources from wildlife, which can be a challenge for growing and harvesting crops. Flocks of blackbirds and herds of deer always seem hungry.
Reclaiming marshland has significant costs and difficulties, too. Building and maintaining canal dikes and infrastructure of irrigation systems is costly and time consuming. Adjacent landowners could be affected by seepage and crop damage, including increased wildlife pressure.
Q: In what ways to do you work directly with Ron Cole? How would you describe your relationship with the refuges?
As a member of the Lease Land Advisory Board and the Klamath Water Users Board, I deal with issues connected to the refuge system, not to mention the refuge borders my main ranch on three sides.
I appreciate the experience Ron Cole has brought to the Klamath Basin Refuges by maintaining clear objectives in his administration. I understand this is a two way street; via cooperation, positive change can be developed that benefits everyone.
Q: How do you see agriculture affecting the refuges? What are the benefits and possible detractions?
Agriculture’s investment in equipment and manpower coupled with the knowledge of how to get things done in a timely fashion can help control weeds, for example, without the use of chemicals while providing thousands of acres of cereal grains for migrations.
Noxious weeds, which are spreading like wildfire, are a detriment to both refuge and farm, and work continues for a good weed abatement policy.
Remnants of the potato crops left in the field are a highly desired food for migrating geese and local Canada goose populations. Other wildlife, such as the sizeable number of deer, are keen to these easy pickings. Being a good steward of the land is the key to the future.
Q: What difference do you think the cooperation between farmers and the refuge manager has made?
When visiting the Walking Wetlands, conservationists, tourists, hunters or any member of the public can easily see the positive impacts of the efforts of agriculturist and refuge management since this new era of cooperation has taken a foothold. They will see diversity of wildlife, increased wildlife numbers, beautiful fields of weed-free, highly productive farmland, and fresh emerging marshes.
The relationship between the refuge and the community hit a low point in 2001 as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service attempted to use the Endangered Species Act as a punitive regulatory hammer. It should be everyone’s objective to never repeat the insanity of that terrible time.
Q: What are your hopes for the future?
The present administration of the Klamath refuges has me cautiously optimistic. I believe there is opportunity for everyone. By adherence to federal law, such as the Kuchel Act, flexibility and opportunity can be provided for our future.
Side Bar