By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff
Writer
January 8,
2010
A final version
of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement will be available
online at 9 a.m. today, opening up a 30-day public review
period.
Stakeholders have
worked for nearly two years to finalize the document. It calls
for removing four Klamath River dams, providing water
and affordable power to irrigators, and helping endangered fish.
The release of the
final document comes as stakeholders — including government
officials and
representatives of agricultural, tribal, fishery and
environmental interests — wrap up two days of meetings in
Sacramento.
Stakeholders declined to
provide any materials related to the final document prior to
today’s release, but Craig Tucker, Klamath campaign coordinator
for the Karuk Tribe of California, said all recent negotiations
were about making the restoration agreement and the related dam
removal agreement consistent.
“I don’t think you should
expect any substantive changes,” he said.
The meetings Wednesday and
Thursday in Sacramento were the third round in a series of
meetings there and in Portland to finish the agreement. Legal
questions and the extent and number of revisions needed
prevented completion sooner.
“I think the majority of
negotiators around the table are pretty optimistic,” Tucker
said.
Mike Carrier, natural
resources policy adviser to Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski, said the
governor is happy to be able to release the document and get on
to the next phase: letting various organizations, groups and
constituencies review it and have their say.
“Everybody’s committed
to a 30-day window,” he
said.
Tom Mallams, an irrigator
off the Klamath Reclamation Project and president of the Klamath
Off Project Water Users, said he is glad the document will be
available for public review. But, he said, it still contains a
world of problems.
“They tried to remedy some
of them today, but they’re Band-Aids as far as I’m concerned,”
he said.
Mallams said his group is
still being shut out of programs in the document that deal with
providing affordable power and working with off-Project
irrigators with junior water rights.
Some last minute changes
made Thursday also prevented his group from being among the
stakeholders who will sign the dam removal agreement, though the
group sought to be part of it.
“They just shut the door on
us, basically,” he said.
Side Bar
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml