Water
deal on county agenda
Klamath
Commissioners to meet at
2 p.m. on Monday
By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff Writer
The Klamath County Board
of Commissioners will
conduct its final public
meeting on the Klamath
Basin Restoration
Agreement this week
before deciding whether
to support or reject it.
Commissioners will
question stakeholders
who crafted a
restoration agreement at
2 p.m. Monday in the
hearing room of the
Klamath County
Government Center.
The public is invited to
attend the meeting, but
no public comment will
be heard. Eight
different organizations,
groups and agencies
representing various
aspects of the county
were invited and could
be asked questions.
The restoration
agreement is meant to
resolve conflicts over
water in the Klamath
River watershed. It
would involve removing
four Klamath River
hydroelectric dams as
well as conducting fish
habitat restoration and
other work with about $1
billion in federal
funding over 10 years.
Stakeholders released a
final public review
draft of the document in
early January. They and
their constituents have
until Tuesday to say
whether they will
support or reject it.
Those invited to the
meeting to answer
questions include: dam
owner PacifiCorp, the
Klamath Tribes, U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation,
U.S. Department of the
Interior, Klamath Off
Project Water Users,
Upper Klamath Water
Users Association,
Klamath Water Users
Association, Oregon
Water Resources
Department and Gov. Ted
Kulongoski’s staff.
Four irrigation
districts on the Klamath
Reclamation Project —
Tulelake Irrigation
District, Klamath
Irrigation District,
Klamath Drainage
District and
Klamath Basin
Improvement District —
already have voted to
support the restoration
agreement.
The Yurok, Karuk and
Klamath Tribes, Klamath
Water and Power Agency,
the government of
Humboldt County in
California, and
off-Project irrigator
group Upper Klamath
Water Users Association
also voiced support.
Commissioners conducted
a public hearing in
January on the document.
About 400 people
attended and more than
80 spoke. Commissioners
said the comments were
roughly half for and
half against the
restoration agreement.
Side Bar
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
any copyrighted
material herein is
distributed without profit
or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest
in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational
purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml