
Water
groups to meet, discuss differences
County commissioners to provide a facilitator
By
STEVE KADEL
H&N
Staff Writer
February 14, 2008
Representatives
of the Klamath Reclamation Project irrigators, off-Project irrigators
and Klamath Tribes will begin meeting to discuss differences they have
with the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement.
During a work session Wednesday, the
Klamath
County
commissioners encouraged
the three parties to meet to solve issues they have — particularly
with Section 16 of the settlement document.
Commissioners will provide a place to meet and a
facilitator not employed by
Klamath
County
. A date for the first
meeting was not set, although a motion passed by the commissioners
stipulated the parties had until May 1 to make a recommendation on
Section 16. The restoration agreement took 26 stakeholders 2-1/2 years
of negotiations to develop. The 256-page document, released Jan. 15,
allocates water in the
Klamath
River Basin
among tribes, irrigators,
conservationists and fisheries.
It also advocates removal of four hydroelectric dams
owned by PacifiCorp, a Portland-based power company.
Andrea Rabe, an
Upper
Basin
irrigator, said many
off-Project irrigators are concerned about water rights and power.
“We would like to see assurances on water delivery
and equal access to power rates,” she said.
Rabe, a board member of the Resource Conservancy, said
it might take just a couple of sessions to determine whether a
compromise can be reached.
Commissioner John Elliott said it’s unclear who
speaks for the off-Project irrigators.
Al Switzer ag reed, saying it’s important to know
who represents that group.
“That’s going to be critical for people
sitting at the table,” he said.
Rabe said the Resource Conservancy has irrigators from
a wide geographic area, with “a very diverse representation.”
Greg Addington, executive director of the Klamath
Water Users Association, said he just wants to move forward.
Common ground
Switzer said it’s important for the three groups to
find common ground.
“We’re at a crucial point here with our
community,” he said.
Meanwhile, Commissioner Bill Brown brought up the
issue of removing four PacifiCorp dams on the
Klamath River
. That’s a condition on which the entire settlement package
hinges.
“I’ve never been a supporter of dam removal,”
Brown said. “There’s no science behind it and it would probably
affect our rate payers.”
PacifiCorp has opposed dam removal, preferring to trap
fish and truck them around dams.
Elliott noted that the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, which will decide whether to renew PacifiCorp’s
hydroelectric license, has called for fish ladders at the dams at an
estimated cost of $300,000.
“One way or another, the rates are going up,”
he said.
Side
Bar
Panel to help answer questions
A
panel of state and federal government experts will be convened to help
answer local residents’ legal and technical questions about the
Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement.
Klamath
County
commissioners decided to
take that approach after some questions went unanswered during
Monday’s community meeting on the water settlement.
Agencies
to be represented on the panel are the Oregon Water Resources
Department, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Economic
Development, the Oregon Department of Justice, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Marine
Fisheries Service, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon Department of
Forestry, and the
Fremont-Winema
National Forests
.
No
date for the next meeting has been set.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews
|