Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

 

 

      

Survey results: Water settlement questions

March 14, 2008

Klamath Falls Herald and News  

Do you have questions about the proposed Klamath River water settlement?

• Can the 90,000 acres the Tribes would get be traded by them for other more desirable federal lands?

• I wish we could have asked the Oregon Water Resources Department to put in writing that it would never install meters on our wells, both domestic and agricultural so it won’t someday charge us for the water we use.

• Why not include a representative of private property owners below and above the lake? Open the talks to allow more input.

• On average, how many thousand acre-feet of water are sent down the river prior to letting the lake fill for irrigation season?

• How much water has been saved in the Basin by switching from flood to sprinkler irrigation? Could this water be used for negotiation purposes for the off-Project irrigators instead of retiring 30,000 acre-feet?

• If the Tribe considers itself a sovereign nation, and it obtains ownership of the 90,000-acre Mazama Tree Farm, how would this affect Klamath County — property taxes, zoning, Highway 97 access, private property within or adjacent, private property access, and national forest access?

• If the agreement or some form of it goes into effect and the Tribes have not waived their sovereignty, how would parties to the agreement take them to court to enforce the agreement if the Tribes failed to abide by the terms of the agreement?

• Why do they require the dams to be removed without any alternative plan? Do they realize the burden they place on others for the cost of this project?

• What studies have actually been done to see what the impact of removing the dams are? What studies have been done to make sure this is the best possible solution to bring the fish back.

• What is taking so long? I am wondering if the people who hunt and fish in
Klamath County really understand the importance of restoring a natural habitat for fish.

• Why do the county commissioners and general public question the ability of 26 different knowledgeable groups which have the expertise to lead this area into an equitable settlement?

• Why do off-Project irrigators have to do individual farm plans and have them OK’d by some new governing committee to get the same power rate as those on the Project? Also, just who will make up this committee?

• Why has the process not been open to the public and why was it made to include giving land in exchange for the tribes not enforcing their claims to water that have never been quantified?

• How would downstream migrating juvenile salmon survive the high temperatures and low oxygen in the water below the Linkville Dam that won’t support suckers during portions of the year?
 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

Source:  http://www.heraldandnews.com/articles/2008/03/14/

viewpoints/op-ed/doc47da14b190619840607321.txt