Water storage still
needed, even if it won’t be at Long Lake
Proposed project doesn’t justify its
large cost
Klamath Falls Herald and News Editorial
Long Lake’s
potential as a water storage site has been proposed,
studied, discussed and fought over for decades. Now
it’s time to look elsewhere for a place to store
water.
On Monday, the
Bureau of Reclamation said studies of the usually
dry basin west of Upper Klamath Lake didn’t justify
an expense of $550 million to $2.3 billion. The cost
estimate was dependent on the amount of storage
expected. The Basin floor would have to be sealed
and a dike built.
According to
water and weather records, and the need to meet
legally required Klamath River flows for protected
salmon species in the lower river, it appears likely
water could have been pumped into Long Lake only
once every seven to 10 years.
There isn’t
enough payback for a plan so big and costly.
It’s time to
move on, even though Long Lake has been a part of
the local water struggle for so long we don’t doubt
some people still want it considered.
What should get
consideration are the most feasible sites left on
the Bureau of Reclamation’s list of 15 others that
have been suggested as storage sites over the years,
along with any others that there may be.
It isn’t likely
a project that received such a negative report at
the local level could be turned around, especially
with the cost involved.
The Bureau’s
report on Long Lake was a long time coming. Studies
had been ongoing for at least 10 years leading up to
the report, and discussions and proposals about the
lake’s possibilities are much older than that. It
was certainly never a sure thing.
In a commentary
in the Herald and News in May, Dan Keppen, executive
director of the Family Farm Alliance and former
executive director of the Klamath Water Users
Association, said at best Long Lake was far in the
future.
He pointed out
the Bureau of Reclamation, “an agency that built its
reputation on dam construction in the last century —
is still in the study phase on Long Lake, and other
potentially obstructionist federal regulatory
agencies have yet to enter the fray.”
Water storage should be part of the
answer for the Basin’s water problems. The Bureau of
Reclamation and local water users should keep the
search alive for the right location.
Pat Bushey wrote today’s
editorial.