GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
We want water, not
handouts
Testimony touches on impacts of
2001 shortage
By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff Writer
March 10, 2010
Klamath Basin residents told
Gov. Ted Kulongoski that they need irrigation
water, not government bailouts.
The governor
was in Klamath Falls Tuesday to address what
could be the worst drought to hit the region in
decades. He heard from invited speakers
representing farming, tribal and agricultural
business communities during a public meeting at
the Klamath County Government Center.
“The reason
I’m here is to listen,” the governor said.
Kulongoski
recalled his first visit to the Basin in 2002,
when residents didn’t care what he had to say
because of the way the state handled the area’s
water shutoff in 2001.
“They just
wanted to know what side I was on,” he said.
The governor
said he doesn’t want to be in that position
again, and pledged the approach to the Basin’s
drought issues this time will be different. He
said he would do whatever he could to mitigate
impacts of the expected water shortage,
including fast-tracking elements of the Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement. He said he would
sign a drought declaration for the county,
possibly as early as next week.
Speakers
told Kulongoski that any water shortage
reminiscent of 2001 — when irrigation water was
shut off — would be disastrous for those who
survived that crisis, especially in light of the
recent economic recession.
“Repeating 2001 would be the last straw for
many,” said Dave Solem, manager of Klamath
Irrigation District.
A few also called for quicker implementation
of the restoration agreement, a 369-page
document developed to resolve water
conflicts in the Klamath River watershed.
The document was negotiated by stakeholders
groups to deal with drought situations such
as the one facing the Basin this year. The
agreement, however, still needs
Congressional funding and legislation before
it can be implemented.
Kulongoski
agreed that quicker implementation of the
restoration agreement is an appropriate course
of action. Politics and money issues in
Washington, D.C., likely would prevent full
implementation, but portions of the document,
such as drafting a drought plan, can be carried
out now.
“If we’d at
least had this process in place in 2001,we’d have
been in better shape,” Kulongoski said.
He’s also
holding weekly meetings with his staff and state
department heads on the Basin’s water situation.
Kulongoski
said that while it is important the economic
impacts of the drought be addressed, he’s also
working to ensure state and federal agencies
take a consistent approach to the Basin’s
problems and a range of support is provided for
those affected.
“It’s not just about the crops,”
he said. “It’s about your lives, your children’s
lives and the community in the Basin.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml