State lawmakers are considering adding a
line item of about $1.50 to that monthly tally to
help pay for removal of four hydroelectric dams on
the Klamath River.
The dams belong to Pacific Power’s parent
company, Portland-based PacifiCorp, and their
removal is a key element to implementation of a
water agreement that settles long-standing issues in
the Klamath River Basin.
It’s not uncommon for customers and
organizations to protest an increase in a utility’s
monthly charges, but some say sometimes paying more
now is better in the long term.
“Sometimes it’s necessary for companies to
raise rates to make investments,” said Bob Jenks,
executive director of the ratepayer advocate
Citizens’ Utility Board.
Cost of power
The Oregon Public Utilities Commission
lists the true cost of power as the largest portion
of an average electric bill in the state. About 49
percent of the money you pay each month goes toward
generating power or buying it from other companies
and providing it to customers.
PacifiCorp spokesman Tom Gauntt said the
remaining portion of the bill goes toward other
costs of providing power, such as replacing worn-out
equipment, installing and maintaining transmission
lines and facilities, repaying investors and paying
for administration and customer service.
Taxes and fees
More than 10 percent of your monthly bill
goes to state and local taxes and fees. Oregon has
two charges on monthly bills that go to the Energy
Trust of Oregon to fund energy conservation
projects.
The city of Klamath Falls charges the
utility rent for the space its transmission lines
and
electric poles occupy, a cost that is passed on to
consumers as a tax. Many cities levy a similar
charge, and it represents a substantial portion of
their annual revenue, Gauntt said.
Not everyone likes all the charges
utilities require consumers to pay, and Jenks of the
Citizens’ Utility Board, or CUB, works with the
Oregon PUC to monitor new charges.
Jenks said his organization has been
successful at halting utilities from putting
inappropriate expenses on the backs of customers.
One example was natural gas provider Avista trying
to put the expense of buying 4-H pigs in Washington
on the bills of its Oregon customers.
But increased costs are
justified at times. When a utility wants to make
wind power part of its energy portfolio, there’s an
initial high cost that consumers must pay for. But
wind power doesn’t require a fuel source, such as
coal or natural gas, balancing that initial high
cost over the long run.
The same could end up being
the case with a proposed surcharge to remove the
four dams. Jenks said his organization doesn’t know
whether removal is the best course, but CUB is
supporting the state legislation because it would
require a prudence review to ensure that removal is
better for consumers than refurbishing the dams for
fish passage and making other improvements.
Side Bar