Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.

 

 

 

 

      

 

Who spoke up for the Basin
 
 
By TY BEAVER & LEE JUILLERAT
H&N Staff Writers

March 10, 2010

 

Greg Addington, executive director, Klamath Water Users Association

 

 

      Greg Addington was among those who spent years developing a 369-page document that details how to address a dry water year like the one facing the Klamath Basin today.

 

   But the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, though signed, hasn’t been funded or implemented yet, and irrigators and other stakeholders are stuck with the old rules, he said.

 

   Addington, executive director of the Klamath Water Users Association, told Gov. Ted Kulongoski Tuesday that a drought declaration is what is most needed from the state. The governor’s office also could help the region by promoting regulatory flexibility, which would allow as much groundwater into the Klamath Reclamation Project as possible.

 

   Surface water is the No. 1 priority of the Project, Addington said, though unused federal stimulus funds and other financial aid also could help Basin farmers who grow crops on thousands of acres.

 

   Provisions of the restoration agreement also should be on a fast track to implementation, Addington said. A farmer supportive of the agreement told Addington that if the document is good for him in the coming   decades, it’s good for him now. Addington said he agreed with him.

 

   “In my opinion, we can’t afford to wait for congressional action,” he said.  

 

Rob Unruh, Malin-area farmer 

 

 

     Malin-area farmer Rob Unruh usually avoids speaking in public, but agreed to do so because this year’s water problems are too important.

 

   Unruh was among those who testified Tuesday during a public meeting with Gov. Ted Kulongoski.

 

   He and his family operate a 500-acre farm where they raise potatoes, wheat and alfalfa.  

 

   Unruh said the 2001 Klamath Basin water crisis dramatically affected the Malin community, resulting in the closure of the town’s only gas station and auto repair shop. The hardware store reported $150,000 in lost sales, a restaurant suffered and eventually closed, and its owner later committed suicide.

 

   He noted that before 2001, the Klamath Basin had 30,000 acres in potatoes. Now, it has 11,000. The number of potato packing sheds dropped from 23 to nine. Of those, three are in Malin. He said a water shutoff could result in the closure of Malin Elementary School and the post office, and create other problems.  

 

   “It’s impossible to describe 2001 … the immediate loss of farm income. Farmers going broke, forced to retire. Farm jobs lost. Homes, farms and ranches gone. Dust blowing, then the weeds growing,” Unruh said. “If there are no water deliveries, I guess for lack of a better term we need a local stimulus package or a government bailout.”

 

   He estimated the bailout would need to be as high as $1,000 per acre.  

 

Jeff Mitchell, Council member, Klamath Tribes 

 

 

     Jeff Mitchell, a member of the Klamath Tribes tribal council, stressed urgency when he talked to Gov. Ted Kulongoski Tuesday.

 

   “If this tells you anything, it’s that we don’t have time to waste,” Mitchell said of the need to protect endangered fish and provide water for Klamath Reclamation Project water users. “It’s a very serious time for our community … We need leadership, governor.”        Mitchell said state and federal assistance needs to be immediate and should be consistent with provisions outlined in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, a document that aims to resolve water disputes in the Klamath River watershed.

 

   He emphasized the agreement, which has been signed by stakeholders but not funded by Congress, “only works if the people survive.”

 

   He said past disputes have created friction between the Upper and Lower Klamath River basins, noting, “We’re tired of being pushed apart. We know that option doesn’t work.”

 

   The Klamath Tribes’ annual Return of the C’waan (Lost River sucker) ceremony, which celebrates the return of the fish swimming up the Sprague River to spawn, is next week.

 

   “We’re going to pray over those fish,” Mitchell said.  

 

Bob Gasser, co-owner of Basin Fertilizer 

 

     Bob Gasser believed the 2001 water shutoff for the Klamath Reclamation Project was unjustified, as scientific studies later showed. The co-owner of Basin Fertilizer said the same is true for this year’s water crisis.

 

   Gasser told Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski Tuesday that what the Basin needs is water, not handouts, adding that the Basin’s residents would “much rather pay taxes to the state than receive welfare.”    

 

   Those same things — cut hours, lost sales — are occurring today as news of an expected water shortage shakes the Basin agricultural community.

 

   Gasser and his business partner recently built a new storage facility, and sales have to come through in order to pay off the debt that went toward it. Without business, other aspects have to give.

 

   “I just canceled a tractor order for Donnie, and I’ll likely have to cancel more,” he said, referring to Donnie Boyd, owner of Floyd A. Boyd Co.  

 

   The drought facing the region isn’t all the work of Mother Nature, he said, but the result of mismanagement of Upper Klamath Lake by government agencies.

 

   “No one can convince me it’s fair to not send water to the Project when the snow pack is at 70 percent,” he said.

 

   Gasser told the governor that his business survived the 2001 water crisis, but not unscathed. He lost 75 percent of his sales, and as a result didn’t buy any new equipment, hurting other businesses. He had 32 employees, half who had worked for the business for 20 years or more. None were laid off, but their wages were cut in half.

 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml