House Resource Committee Press Release:
For
Immediate Release
Monday, June
21, 2004
Contact:
Brian Kennedy, 202-226-9019
Resources
Committee to hold ESA Hearing on
The
Klamath Project
Washington
,
DC
- House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) announced today that
the Committee will hold a field hearing in
Klamath Falls
,
Oregon
on the Endangered Species Act. The
hearing, to be held at
9:00 a.m.
on July 17 at the
Ross Ragland Theatre in downtown
Klamath Falls
, will cover the Endangered Species Act's impact on the Klamath Project, one of
the nation's oldest federal irrigation projects.
The Klamath Project was the subject of
international coverage in 2001 when Endangered Species Act regulations
protecting sucker fish and coho salmon forced the
bulk of the project to virtually shut down its water delivery system for almost
the entire growing season. Local
business leaders estimate that the termination of water deliveries in 2001
inflicted $200 million worth of economic damage on the
Klamath
Basin
community.
Although federal and state efforts have
focused on resolving the situation, the Klamath project was nearly shut down
last summer because of Endangered Species Act requirements.
Klamath irrigators face another dry summer this year, prompting many
worries of another devastating irrigation water cut-off.
Meanwhile, a National Research Council Report last year questioned some
of the underlying endangered species science behind the 2001 shut down.
Rep.
Richard W. Pombo (R-CA), Chairman, Committee on Resources
The
water shut-off in the
Klamath
Basin
is a dramatic example of how, after 30 years, the Endangered Species Act has
failed the species it was designed to recover.
Unintended consequences have devastated communities.
We must find a sound and balanced approach, one that conserves species
while caring for our local communities as well.
This hearing is specifically designed to discuss the abuse of this law
and to find a scientific solution to updating
and improving the ESA so that further generations will not have to suffer as the
Klamath farmers have.
Rep.
Ken Calvert (R-CA), Chairman, Subcommittee on Water and Power
We
owe the American people the very best scientific answers when it comes to
balancing human water needs with endangered species protection.
Time
and again, we have found that the Endangered Species Act needs to be updated to
both improve species protection and provide needed water to our farmers and
cities. When the science has been
questioned by a team of independent, qualified biologists and that two
conflicting species regulations continue to provide environmental and water use
uncertainty in the Klamath basin, it's our duty to help provide the roadmap to
resolution and this hearing will help accomplish that.
Rep.
Greg Walden (R-OR), Chairman, Subcommittee on Forests and
Forest
Health
Time
and time again we have seen how the use of questionable science in the
implementation of the Endangered Species Act has thrown communities like the
Klamath
Basin
into economic upheaval with no benefit to the threatened species.
During next month's hearing we will examine the
National
Academy
of Sciences final report that repudiated the scientific justification behind the
2001 water shut-off. Hopefully by
studying the Klamath Basin water crisis and similar situations across the United
States, we can develop a blueprint for making common sense improvements to the
ESA that benefit both species and property owners.
Rep.
John T. Doolittle (R-CA)
The
Klamath basin farmers have suffered long enough at the hands of bad science and
an inflexible Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We look forward to this hearing and the long over-due investigation on
the impacts of the ESA and the recommendations from the National Research
Council.
Rep.
Wally Herger (R-CA)
The
2001
Klamath
Basin
water shut off was a tragedy that could have, and should have been avoided.
Thanks to the diligence of biologists, community leaders and the National
Academy of Sciences, we now know the demands for water from our farmers is
political, and completely devoid of scientific grounding.
Now, more than three years later, the Klamath farming community still
faces hardships resulting from the 2001 shut off.
Along
with Congressmen Doolittle and Walden, I requested this hearing to shed national
light on how speculation and a radical agenda influenced the Klamath decision,
and how an inflexible Endangered Species Act prevented any alternatives.
I would like to thank Chairman Pombo and Chairman Calvert for agreeing to
hold this hearing, and for their continued support of sound science and
Klamath
Basin
agriculture.
###