Ranching
Forever in Off Project
By Becky Hyde
October 26, 2009
When my mother-in-law Gerda settled
our water rights at Yamsi on the Upper Williamson
she had a lunch celebration in the old ranch dining
room with tribal council. This settlement
represented such a relief to our family.
But, our ranch in Beatty is not very
secure. Ten-cent power for irrigation pumping will
shut us down. Endangered Suckers and Red Band trout
have forever changed the way we do business. We have
very junior 1950 water rights on part of the ranch,
making us vulnerable if the Klamath tribes prevail
on their claims, and also vulnerable to the Klamath
Project irrigators. This has left me sleepless many
nights, and I know other families are worried as
well. We want our children and our neighbors’
children to have the opportunity to ranch, and
maintain our way of life.
Upper Klamath Water Users
Association—Underdogs Working Hard
Upper Klamath Water Users Association
formed over a year ago to ensure that all upper
basin irrigators could work toward the stability
like our family at Yamsi experienced. The UKWUA
board and members want to have the best terms
possible for water security, regulatory assurances,
and affordable power delivery.
Each of our board members’ ranch or
farm in the off project, and are devoted to
agriculture. UKWUA came late to the Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement settlement table, and so we
are playing serious catch up and trying to pick up
the pieces to secure benefits for the off project in
that document.
Resource Conservancy—Bogged
Down in Fear
There are at least seven other groups
in the off project area: Resource Conservancy, Fort
Klamath Critical Habitat, Sprague River Resource
Foundation, Sprague River Water Users, Save the
Family Farm, Water for Life, and Off Project Water
Users/Off Project Power Users.
They take a different approach than UKWUA’s. They
rely on endless, costly and often-poorly thought out
litigation. They have a track record of mis-representing
facts to further stir people’s fears. These
organizations are mostly run by the exact same
people.
You might ask Roger Nicholson, Tom
Mallams and Doug Whitsett why they have so many
groups. Is there clear transparency and accounting
for where hard earned off project agricultural
dollars are spent?
For years these groups have targeted
anyone outside their core group who challenges their
approach and logic to decision making. I’m the
latest to draw the short straw.
For example, there is nothing
threatening about the fact that our family has a
conservation easement on our land that assures
grazing. We understand lots of people don’t like
easements—that’s okay with us. You don’t have to
put one on your land. However, it is silly to say
that our family is in a “real estate deal” or
“consulting” relationship with the Klamath Tribes.
Everyone in this basin knows a statement like that
is only meant to build fear. The tribes act
responsibly in their relation to us, in their roll
as a land trust. If you’re curious about what a land
trust is—please ask.
Together Lets Secure A Future
For Off Project Ranching
It’s common knowledge that I do
contract work for a non-profit called Sustainable
Northwest, and that they have also helped UKWUA with
grants and technical assistance. This helps not
harms the off project. Sustainable Northwest has
worked in places like Lake County—helping keep the
mill open and develop biomass projects, and
developing small diameter timber markets in Wallowa
County.
There are no secrets here. Talk to
me, or the UKWUA board if you’re nervous. We’re
working to build stability for every family in the
off project. Together we create the best solutions.
I grew up on a hardscrabble high
desert ranch raised by parents that believed you had
to take the problems that face ranching head on, and
playing victim was not allowed. My very capable
mother-in-law proved that you can make great wild
plum jam, cook hamburgers for big crowds at the
Klamath Bull Sale for 50 years, and create a water
settlement too. Join us!
(Permission to post from the
author.)