|
|
CEC
urges rate hike to remove Klamath dams, not fisheries upgrade
|
|
|
The
California Energy Commission (CEC) has called on three states to allow
only cost recovery for removing the Klamath dams and urged them not to
increase electricity rates to help fund upgrades with fish passages.
In
identical letters issued to the public utilities commissions (PUCs) of
The dams
are JC Boyle, Copco 1 & 2 and
Earlier
this year, CEC and PacifiCorp traded critiques of their respective cases
against and for the dams. In sending the letters to the states, CEC was
issuing its economic analysis for the PUCs to consider.
In
March, CEC claimed that removing the Klamath dams but improving fish
passage at a fifth dam – Keno - was the best economic option for
fisheries protection and refuted the findings of a study undertaken by a
consultant for PacifiCorp. The utility said the study concluded there
were flaws in the CEC analysis, but which the Commission rejected.
PacifiCorp
wants to invest approximately US$300M to protect fisheries by installing
fish ladders. CEC wants the dams gone, and while having admitted it
‘rectified’ some data in its analysis following the report from the
consultant acting for PacifiCorp, it claimed the re-analysed economic
case for dam removal was even stronger.
In the
letters, CEC said the FERC relicensing process for the Klamath dams
presented a ‘once-in-a-generation’ chance to restore the river
habitat. It argues that the dams have significant environmental impact
in relation to the electricity obtained from the facilities. The
Commission has urged that the only rate rise approval in relation to the
dams is for cost recovery for decommissioning.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.waterpowermagazine.com/story.asp?sectioncode=130&storyCode=2047733