|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|


Power
Resources Program of
Klamath
River
Basin
Agreement
Prepared by
KWUA
Summary
Stabilizing power costs is an important component of the Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement and is closely related to the Water
Resources Program. This
document provides background and a program summary as related to the
Klamath Reclamation Project.
Background
The Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Reclamation Project is
unique and has had a longstanding relationship with PacifiCorp’s
Hydroelectric Project. Original
plans for the Klamath Reclamation Project contemplated the development
of power by the Bureau of Reclamation for use in the Klamath Reclamation
Project. In 1917,
PacifiCorp’s predecessor entered an agreement by which it constructed
Link River Dam and agreed to sell power at low cost to irrigators and
Reclamation in lieu of Reclamation developing power on the river.
In the 1950s, when PacifiCorp’s predecessor sought a license
for PacifiCorp’s hydroelectric project including the planned J.C. Boyle
facility, Reclamation initially voiced objection that the license would
preclude development of low-cost federal power to benefit the irrigation
project. This concern was resolved through a license term requiring
extension of the 1917 contract including its power terms, for at least
the term of the FERC license. The
long relationship was reflected and codified in the Klamath River Basin
Compact adopted enacted by California and Oregon, and ratified by
Congress, in 1957, which provides that it is the objective of the
states, in connection with the development of hydroelectric resources on
the Klamath River “to secure…the lowest power rates which may be
reasonable for irrigation and drainage pumping, including pumping from
wells.”
In the FERC relicensing process for PacifiCorp’s hydroelectric
dams, Reclamation has proposed a license condition that would
substantially continue the historic relationship for the Klamath
Reclamation Project, by requiring the company to deliver power to the
Klamath Reclamation Project based on the cost associated with providing
power from PacifiCorp’s hydro dams specifically (the predecessor
contract is based on cost of generating power at the dams). The
condition is opposed by PacifiCorp and others and would preclude
settlement. Additionally,
other mandatory license conditions would drive up the cost of generation
considerably; Klamath Reclamation Project irrigators, in the settlement
process, agreed with other parties that they would not pursue action
that could diminish license conditions related to fish protection, and
effectively agreed to allow the cost of generation to increase.
In other Reclamation projects, low costs “reserved” or
“project use” power is made available for certain loads.
Also, many irrigators in the PacifiCorp Northwest have access to
BPA power or similar alternatives through PUDs or similar entities.
These types of arrangements were neither necessary nor pursued in the
history of the Klamath Reclamation Project due to the long-standing
relationship with the hydroelectric project.
The plumbing of the Klamath Project is also unique; low cost
power is a part of its infrastructure.
A significant portion of the power goes to recirculate water
(achieving efficiencies), provide water to national wildlife refuges, to
pump water back into the
Klamath River
for use by fish, and to operate pressurized sprinkler
systems that use less water than flood irrigation.
These pumping operations are essential for water efficiency and
successful pursuit of the Water Resources Program.
Already, Klamath Reclamation Project irrigators faced with
potentially considerable power cost increases have considered or in some
cases undertaken changes in practices that reduce historic water
efficiencies.
Program
Summary
The Power
Resources Program as related to the Klamath Reclamation Project consists
of three elements.
First, for the short-term, funding is provided to stabilize total
power costs as other components of the program are brought on line.
The Parties have supported the Interim Power Sustainability
program as part of the KRBA with funding estimated at $7.69 million for
2008-2010. This program
would also provide benefits for irrigation water users outside the
Klamath Reclamation Project.
Second, “Project Use” power from the
Columbia River
system would be authorized
by federal legislation for specified loads in the Klamath Reclamation
Project, not including pumps owned by individuals to apply water to land
unless the individual is required by contract with Reclamation to
install the pump to take water from Klamath Reclamation Project
facilities. The program
would reduce BPA power supplies by less than 0.01 percent. The KRBA also
contemplates an agreement with PacifiCorp to deliver this power from
substations within the Klamath Reclamation Project to the loads served.
Third, funding would be provided for energy
efficiency/conservation and renewable generation opportunities and
investment. The activities
that would be expected include installation of efficiency measures, such
as additional improvements in water pumping and piping efficiency, solar
photovoltaic development and net metering programs, investment in
renewable generation on a broader scale, and other practices.
Settlement parties, with considerable expert assistance provided
by the State of
Oregon
and the Bureau of Reclamation, worked diligently to evaluate
alternatives that would leverage expenditures through tax credits and
available regulatory programs. The
program cost including engineering and planning costs is just over $34
million, over fiscal years 2010 through 2013.
The benefits and objectives of this program are designed to serve
irrigation interests both inside and outside of the Klamath Reclamation
Project in the
Upper
Klamath
Basin
.
|