|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

PacifiCorp's Revised
Klamath Proposal No Help to Fish
Buffet’s
PacifiCorp more interested in PR than substance
P R E S S R E L E A S E
KARUK TRIBE
For Immediate Release: December 5, 2006
Contact: Craig Tucker, Klamath Coordinator, Karuk Tribe,
530-627-3446 x3027
Happy Camp, CA – The same day that California and
Federal Agencies released a report describing how dam removal would
save billionaire investor Warren Buffet’s PacifiCorp millions of
dollars, the company proposed changes federal agencies’ mandatory
fish passage plans.
“PacifiCorp is billing this revised plan as some sort of compromise
when their proposal falls far short of what federal agencies are
mandating and does little to stop the wholesale destruction of Klamath
salmon,” according to Leaf Hillman, Vice Chairman of the Karuk
Tribe.
PacifiCorp’s press release claims that the revised plan
“demonstrates both its [PacifiCorp’s] willingness and strong
desire to work with the Departments of Interior and Commerce to focus
on improving conditions for fish,” however, a footnote on page one
of the plan states “this filing should not be considered a
replacement of PacifiCorp’s existing proposed alternative.”
According to Erica Terence of the Northcoast Environmental Center in
Arcata, CA, “This is nothing but a corporate spin job. Don’t be
fooled. Buffet’s PacifiCorp isn’t interested in doing the right
thing for fish or rate payers or else they would be negotiating
instead of greenwashing.”
The joint state/federal study filed last week concludes that
PacifiCorp would save over $100 million by removing the dams instead
of bringing the antiquated complex up to modern standards. “These
savings would be passed to ratepayers. Instead, the company will try
to bill ratepayers for the cost of relicensing plus a little extra as
a bonus for shareholders like Warren Buffet. While our fish go
extinct, Buffet will get even richer and power rates will go up,”
explains Hillman.
Regulated utilities earn profits for shareholders through capital
improvement projects. Shareholders pay for the improvement plus an
added percentage of the cost to be given to investors. These
improvement projects must be approved by state regulators.
Its not only economic studies that favor dam removal. Another
California agency reported that the sediment trapped behind the dams
is limited and non-toxic. That report concluded that dam removal is
“safe and affordable.”
Last summer, Tribes, fishermen, and communities dependant on a healthy
river for economic survival were encouraged when PacifiCorp President
Bill Ferhman responded to a protest staged by dam removal advocates in
Portland by stating, “We have heard the Tribes’ concerns. We are
not opposed to dam removal or other settlement opportunities as long
as our customers are not harmed and our property rights are
respected.”
“Obviously Mr. Ferhman has not heard our concerns. Ferhman and
Buffet are still clinging to these dams which are nothing less than
weapons of genocide,” says Hillman.
# # #
For more information and previous press releases log on to: http://www.karuk.us/press%20&%20campaigns/press.php
To see California study on safety and feasibility of dam removal: http://elibrary.FERC.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20060926-5075
Or http://www.karuk.us/press%20&%20campaigns/press.php
FERC dEIS for Klamath Project:
http://elibrary-backup.ferc.gov/idmws/common/OpenNat.asp?fileID=11141022.
Other documents including the CA/Federal economic analysis can be
found at http://www.ferc.gov.
The FERC project number for the Klamath Project number is 2082-027.
S. Craig Tucker, Ph.D.
Klamath Campaign Coordinator
Karuk Tribe of California
office: 530-627-3446 x3027
cell: 916-207-8294
ctucker
[at] karuk.us
http://www.karuk.us
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information
for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|