KLAMATH BASIN - The Oregon Coastal Salmon fishermen don't believe the
environmentalists who claim irrigating fields in Klamath Basin destroyed this
year's coastal fisheries.
Last week fishermen, including several members of the Oregon Salmon
Commission, met with Klamath Basin irrigators to tour the Klamath Project.
Members of the commission are fishermen or processors appointed by Oregon
Department of Agriculture.
This was the latest in a series of meetings with farmers and fishermen who are
major stakeholders in Klamath Basin water issues. Dick Carleton worked hard
developing relationships with coastal fishermen, promoting dialogue and
organizing this event.
Farmers and fishermen thank the Oregon Department of Agriculture for
sponsoring the tour.
With direction from the Klamath Fisheries Management Council, NOAA Fisheries
substantially curtailed this year's commercial salmon fishing season on 700
miles of Pacific Coast.
The Council projected a short run of fall chinook salmon in the Klamath River,
chinook that did not spawn in a hatchery. There is no genetic difference
between hatchery-spawned fish and natural-spawned fish. Similarly, there is no
genetic difference between back-seat conceived and bedroom-conceived babies.
Even though other tributaries and rivers may have record runs of salmon this
year, the reduced season is based only on their guess on the Klamath
natural-spawned fall-run Chinook.
Environmentalists, tribes and left-wing politicians blame the Klamath Project
for the fishing season being decreased, and are advocating dam removal and
downsizing agriculture to fix the river.
Farmers presented a video to the fishermen explaining the Klamath Project
plumbing with its dams, reservoirs, lakes and canals. Some of the guests were
Senator Doug Whitsett, John Snider from Congressman Greg Walden's office, Dr
Harry Carlton from U.C. Davis Extension Office, Dr. Ken Rykbost, retired OSU
Extension Office supervisor.
Whitsett said, "Much like the Klamath Basin irrigators endured in 2001,
the coastal salmon fishers are experiencing a perfect regulatory storm not
caused by their actions and beyond their control. The combination of prolonged
salmon hatchery mismanagement, a specious definition of 'natural' salmon that
defies a federal court order, sea lion predation at the mouth of the Klamath
River and C. Shasta parasitism in the mainstem Klamath River has resulted in
the financially devastating closure of 700 miles of the coastal salmon
fishery. Like the Klamath irrigators, the Coastal fishers have met the enemy
and it is their own government. These independent businessmen donated heavily
in 2001 to help the irrigators in their time of financial disaster. We must do
no less for them in their time of need."
Rykbost explained Klamath River hydrology and pointed out the flaws in Dr. Tom
Hardy's studies. These studies were used to form the biological opinion that
controls irrigation water allocations and river flow requirements.
"Hardy Flow Regimes requested for summer months could not be met in a
significant number of years even if the Klamath Project received no diversions
from Upper Klamath Lake or Klamath River," according to Rykbost's power
point presentation. It may be viewed at
www.klamathbasincrisis.org/science/04watershedken032304.ppt
Hardy's studies are flawed and the National Research Council found them to
be dysfunctional regarding Klamath River fish needs, however the Bureau of
Indian Affairs has hired Dr. Hardy again to create a Hardy 3 report to control
Klamath River flows.
Fishermen tour the Klamath Project
Tours included Upper Klamath Lake, Dick Carleton's well, Anderson Rose Dam, D
Plant, Sheepy Ridge overlooking Tulelake and Lower Klamath, and Straits Drain.
Tulelake Irrigation District Manager Earl Donosky led the group through D
Plant, which pumps 80,000 acre feet of water through a 6,000' by 10' tunnel
through Sheepy Ridge. He explained that when Reclamation turned Tule
Lake into farmland, they needed to get rid of excess water so they built the
tunnel to send water from the farms to Lower Klamath Refuge and on into the
Klamath River for Pacific Power to generate electricity. The irrigators pay
the entire expense of this pumping station which costs $40,000 per year to
operate. If Pacific Power raises power bills to tariff rate, the cost
will be one million dollars per year.
The group viewed Tule Lake and Lower Klamath farmland and
refuges from Sheepy Ridge. Steve Kandra and Bob Gasser from Klamath Water
Users Association described the Reclamation process, pointing out the large
area of the former shallow Tule Lake. They explained Project benefits and
efficiency. The historic lake evaporated more water than is currently used by
the Klamath Project.
The latest successful farming process is "walking wetlands," a
cooperative venture with Fish and Wildlife Service and farmers where they
rotate farmland and wetlands on the refuges every three years. This benefits
farms and wildlife
Farms supply more than 50 percent of the feed for waterfowl in the Klamath
Basin Pacific Flyway.
Bob Flowers showed the group Straits Drain, where all the water that goes
through the D Plant tunnel and doesn't evaporate from Lower Klamath Refuge is
returned to Klamath River.
Flowers explained the history of lake levels before the Klamath Project was
built. He said with the current biological opinion, Klamath water levels and
river flows are kept artificially higher than historic levels, and excessive
warm water will kill fish. Water from springs near Boyle Dam previously cooled
the river. Currently warm shallow Lower Klamath Refuge water is being sent
down the river.
Fishermen tell their stories
The fishermen were amazed at the complex irrigation system and one stated that
he felt the designers must have been geniuses to create such an efficient,
beneficial project.
Fisherman Tommie Hockema is not able to fish at all this year. Being allowed
only four days at a time to fish, he said it takes one or two days to locate
the fish. He is forced to travel to distant towns to put his boat in the water
and pay rent, ice and expenses, and the weather is usually bad one or two of
those days. He said that one day of fishing that's left does not cover his
expenses.
He does not think the Klamath salmon solution is dam removal, "I don't
see any evidence that if we take out the dams, it will help anything. Don't
take dams out."
Hockema said fishermen have put out salmon hatching boxes at their own expense
since 1898, but now Fish and Wildlife limits them on how many fish they can
hatch.
The fishermen were amazed how different and positive the Klamath Project is
compared to green media myths.
Klamath Water Users Executive Director Greg Addington said, "This was a
great opportunity for us to share information, show them the Klamath Project
and dispel some common myths. They were a great audience and asked good
questions. It is pretty clear to me that farmers and fisherman have more
in common than not. There were commitments from both sides to continue the
dialogue and to search out common ground where we can help one another."
Permission to post from the publisher.