|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Klamath
Dam Removal Advocates Win Major Victory in Dams Toxics Case
by
Dan Bacher
March 21, 2008
Klamath
Dam removal advocates won a major victory in the dams toxics case today
when the EPA announced it was reconsidering its decision not to
designate the Klamath River as impaired by toxic algae.

iron_gate_dam.jpg
Klamath
Dam Removal Advocates Win Major Victory in Dams Toxics Case
KLAMATH RIVERKEEPER PRESS RELEASE:
For immediate release: March 20, 2008, 2008
Contact: Regina Chichizola, Klamath Riverkeeper 541 951-0126
Chris Sprowl, Environmental Advocates (415) 533-3376
KLAMATH DAM REMOVAL ADVOCATES WIN MAJOR VICTORY IN DAMS TOXICS CASE
Lawsuit moves EPA to list Klamath as impaired by PacifiCorp’s toxic
discharge
Orleans, CA –Klamath Riverkeeper won a major concession today from the
Environmental Protection Agency related to the toxic algae created by
PacifiCorp’s reservoirs on the Klamath River. In the wake of
litigation filed by Klamath Riverkeeper, the agency reconsidered its
decision to not designate the
Klamath River
as impaired by the toxic
algae. The reservoirs created by PacifiCorp’s dams are the origin of
the blooms of the toxic blue green algae Microcystis aeruginosa, a liver
toxin and known tumor promoter.
“Given the fact that the concentration of algal toxin exceeds
international safety standards by as much as 4,000 fold, we could not
believe that the EPA failed to act. We hope today’s announcement
signals a commitment by the agency to stop PacifiCorp’s toxic
pollution of the
Klamath River
and will ultimately drive
another nail in the coffin for PacifiCorp’s dams,” said Regina
Chichizola, the Klamath Riverkeeper.
This lawsuit was just one of a series of legal actions taken by the
Klamath Riverkeeper, Tribal religious leaders, and fishermen over
PacifiCorp’s toxic algae. Last year Robert Kennedy Jr. and Joseph
Cotchett filed a public nuisance case on behalf of Klamath residents.
The case was filed while
Klamath River
residents were appealing to
Warren Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway’s yearly shareholders meeting in
Omaha
,
Nebraska
. PacifiCorp is owned by
Berkshire Hathaway and Buffett is the president of the company and its
major shareholder.
The EPA’s announcement comes at a critical time. PacifiCorp’s dams
are in the final steps of a federally mandated relicensing process. In
order to get a new dam license from the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC), PacifiCorp must first get a clean water certification
from the states of
California
and
Oregon
. The listing of the
reservoirs and river as impaired by toxic algae could jeopardize
PacifiCorp’s clean water permit applications. The EPA announcement
today signals the beginning of a thirty day comment period, however a
listing is all but assured by the agency’s decision to reconsider
their previous stance.
Last year, releases of toxic algae from the reservoirs into the river
turned the river neon green during the peak of the
Klamath River
fishing season and Native
Tribes’ ceremonies. The toxic release lead to over one hundred miles
of the Klamath River being posted by state agencies urging the public to
avoid contact with the water and was a major blow to the remote
Klamath’s rural economy.
“PacifiCorp has become the most destructive power company in the
West,” noted Leaf Hillman, vice chairman of the Karuk Tribe and dam
removal advocate. “Their dams have brought the third greatest salmon
river in
America
to its knees. Their coal
plants are putting over 80 million tons of carbon into our air. Its time
we hold Warren Buffett and PacifiCorp accountable for their impacts to
our environment and our communities. Buffett fights poverty and disease
in the third world while PacifiCorp creates those same conditions right
here in
America
. ”
Klamath Riverkeeper, along with local Tribes, fishermen, and
environmental groups, have been pressuring PacifiCorp to surrender the
Klamath dams for several years. Their efforts have been bolstered by
economic analyses by both FERC and the California Energy Commission
which show dam removal to be cheaper for ratepayers than relicensing.
# # #
For more information see:
http://www.klamathriver.org/
http://www.salmonforsavings.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDny8jvd950
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/21/18487558.php
|