California-Oregon Fishery 'Failure' Declaration Triggers
Financial Aid
By Steve Chawkins, Times Staff Writer
August 11, 2006
Federal officials Thursday declared a "commercial
fishery failure" along a 700-mile stretch of California and Oregon
coastline, triggering a process that will bring financial aid to fishermen
and communities ravaged by the virtual shutdown of the commercial salmon
season.
It is only the second time a fishery has been so clearly stricken that the
government has deemed it a failure even before the season's end, officials
said.
Last month, the federal government made salmon fishermen
eligible for emergency loans from the Small Business Administration — a
move that was criticized as inadequate by many in the fishing community.
Congress is currently considering a $10-million appropriation for
communities hit by the season's virtual shutdown, although one Northern
California congressman has estimated the loss at more than $80 million.
Thursday's declaration by Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez is
designed to prompt speedy congressional approval of grants to an industry
whose revenues have plunged by more than 80% since the season started in
May, according to Commerce officials.
Fishermen on Thursday said help can't arrive too soon.
The failure designation "acknowledges the obvious," said Dave
Bitts, 58, of McKinleyville, Calif.
"This year has been a disaster," he said. "I've had virtually
no income from the salmon fishery, and it's usually half or more of my
annual income. A lot of people — especially younger people saddled with
loans — are going crazy trying to figure out how not to lose their
boats."
In April, the government imposed severe restrictions on salmon fishing from
Oregon's Point Falcon to Point Sur in California. At issue were the
plummeting numbers of salmon swimming into the ocean from the
once-productive Klamath River, which empties into the sea south of Crescent
City, Calif.
Hundreds of thousands of young salmon have been killed there by parasites,
which, according to some biologists, flourish because of the dams that block
the river's natural currents and the irrigation that reduces its typical
flows.
Others aren't sure why the parasites thrive.
For the idled fishermen, the more immediate question is how much aid
Congress will deliver after it receives formal requests from the governors
of California and Oregon. The Commerce Department has pegged the loss of
revenue to the fishermen at $16 million, but officials say an appropriation
would also include relief for dock operators, fish processors, gas stations
and other businesses that rely on the salmon harvest.
"It's two years too late, but it's still good to have," said Zeke
Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's
Assns. "We warned them in July 2004 that there was a problem at hand,
but they chose to ignore it."
Rep. Mike Thompson (D-St. Helena) said the problems experienced by the
fishermen in his Northern California district have been
"devastating."
"Families have lost their homes," he said. He also said he knows
of fishermen desperate to learn new trades who have been forced to drop out
of school for lack of cash.
Thompson has been pushing for an aid package of about $81 million. On
Thursday, he said that figure might not be far from the amount that will be
requested by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Oregon Gov. Ted
Kulongoski.
In addition to helping the fishermen, he said, Congress must also help the
ailing Klamath River. He and other critics blasted a 2002 Bush
administration decision to channel more of the Klamath's water to
agriculture, saying it made the salmon's survival more difficult.
Rep. Sam Farr (D-Carmel) sounded the same note.
"Salmon fishermen were being unfairly penalized for mishandling of the
Klamath River habitat," he said in a statement.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) is a member of the appropriations
committee that approved $10 million in aid last month. She said the
government's unusually swift declaration "underscores the seriousness
of the disaster."
Since the early 1980s, the salmon fishery on the West Coast has been deemed
an economic disaster at least twice.
Some in the industry fear that severe restrictions on salmon catches will
remain in place next year as well.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml