Salmon recovery expenditures draw comment at hearing

 

July 8, 2006

 

 

PASCO, Wash. Some customers of the Bonneville Power Administration are redoubling their call for balance, between rising energy costs and expenditures for recovery of salmon in the Northwest.

That call came in Pasco, Washington, last week, when a U-S House subcommittee held a field hearing there.

 

Nearly eight (b) billion dollars has been spent on fish and wildlife mitigation over the past seven years, by B-P-A, the federal power marketing agency based in Oregon.

 

Some B-P-A customers say those outlays have unjustifiably helped boost power rates, to levels that hurt businesses, schools, farmers and residential consumers of electricity.

 

But Rebecca Miles says blaming salmon recovery work for the cost of home heating is unfair. Miles is chairwoman of the Nez Perce Indian Tribe in Idaho, and a member of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. She told people gathered in Pasco that salmon recovery must be viewed as an investment, not simply an expense.

 
 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
 
Source:  http://www.krtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=5129194