July
8, 2006
PASCO,
Wash. Some customers of the Bonneville Power Administration are redoubling
their call for balance, between rising energy costs and expenditures for
recovery of salmon in the Northwest. That
call came in Pasco, Washington, last week, when a U-S House subcommittee
held a field hearing there.
Nearly
eight (b) billion dollars has been spent on fish and wildlife mitigation
over the past seven years, by B-P-A, the federal power marketing agency
based in Oregon.
Some
B-P-A customers say those outlays have unjustifiably helped boost power
rates, to levels that hurt businesses, schools, farmers and residential
consumers of electricity.
But
Rebecca Miles says blaming salmon recovery work for the cost of home
heating is unfair. Miles is chairwoman of the Nez Perce Indian Tribe in
Idaho, and a member of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
She told people gathered in Pasco that salmon recovery must be viewed as
an investment, not simply an expense.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml