Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

 

 

      

http://www.marzulla.com/index.php

Marzulla Law
1350 Connecticut Ave., NW
Suite 410

Washington DC 20036-1722

(202) 822-6760
www.marzulla.com

 

 

 

Federal Circuit Agrees to Send Klamath Water Issues to Oregon Supreme Court

Washington, (D.C.) – On March 11, 2008, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed to send four issues to the Oregon Supreme Court for resolution at in the pending appeal of Klamath Irrigation District v. United States, No. 2007-5115. The lawsuit involves the taking of water from the Klamath Reclamation Project in 2001 in order to protect two species of endangered fish. In 2004, the trial judge held that the water users had no property right in the Klamath Project, relying on a 1905 Oregon statute that the court held conveyed all of Oregon ’s water rights to the United States . The Federal Circuit’s ruling now means that the Oregon Supreme Court will have a chance to rule on these issues and will determine for itself what the 1905 Oregon statute means. (Click here to download a copy of the Federal Circuit's letter.)

“We are really pleased with that the Federal Circuit agreed with our argument that these important issues of State law should be resolved by an Oregon Court,” stated Nancie G. Marzulla, counsel for the Klamath water districts and water users. “ Oregon courts should be the final arbiter of Oregon law, not a federal judge in Washington .”

Certification of issues pending in federal court “allows a federal court faced with a novel state-law question to put the question directly to the State’s highest court, reducing the delay, cutting the cost, and increasing the assurance of gaining an authoritative response.” In this case, the trial judge had interpreted an Oregon statute based purely on what the trial judge believed that the Oregon State Legislature intended to accomplish in a 1905 statute. No Oregon court had ever interpreted this statute in this context and there was no legislative history supporting the trial judge’s ruling. On appeal, the water districts and the water users argued that this issue and the related water rights issues should be certified to the Oregon Supreme Court for resolution.

The parties have been ordered to submit a joint statement of facts pertinent to the four certified questions by April 9, 2008 . Thereafter, the issues will be transmitted to the Oregon Supreme Court for review.

Related Information:

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Source:  http://www.marzulla.com/news.php?action=view&id=127