By Ken McLaughlin Mercury News SACRAMENTO
- A powerful federal fishing advisory panel Thursday recommended
imposing severe restrictions on the commercial salmon season but stopped short
of calling for canceling it altogether. The decision, which members of the Pacific Fishery Management Council called
``brutal'' and ``gut-wrenching,'' followed a fiery four-hour public hearing at
which salmon fishermen, American Indians and even environmentalists pleaded with
the panel to consider alternatives to canceling this year's salmon season. ``The fish and the fishery are part of our culture and cuisine . . .
providing jobs, recreation, food production and exports, sustaining our bodies
and souls,'' said Zeke Grader of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's
Associations in San Francisco. ``We cannot let this all be lost due to failed
government policies, inaction and indifference.'' The recommendations are aimed at protecting a strain of salmon that breeds in
the Klamath River. Grader, who was gratified that the panel saved the season,
nonetheless described the restrictions as the harshest in the history of West
Coast fishing. The new rules -- which would sharply cut the length of the season
and the size of each boat's weekly haul -- affect waters from northern Oregon to
just south of Monterey. The council's action still has to be approved by the National Marine
Fisheries Service, but no one expects the agency to overrule the council. If
approved, the restrictions will cancel much of the season above Pigeon Point,
south of Half Moon Bay. The season south of Pigeon Point will be less
drastically cut, but fishermen will still be limited to catching 75 king salmon
a week per boat. Commercial fisherman Larry Miyamura, based at Fisherman's Wharf in San
Francisco, said most commercial fishermen catch 75 salmon a day. He predicted
the famous wharf would become ``a ghost town'' for much of the summer and that
the price of wild salmon caught locally will rise 20 percent to 25 percent. ``Thank God we kept the season open, but we didn't keep much of it open,''
Grader said. Recreational fishermen got off a bit easier. For the month of April, they'll
be limited to fishing in state waters, no more than three miles from shore. Then
they'll lose several more days during the season, which will begin May 1 in
federal waters. ``We don't have the impact that the commercial guys have because we're
catching two fish a day with rods and reels,'' said Darrell Ticehurst of
Hillsborough, a member of the management council. The fishermen came to Thursday's meeting with a clear strategy: convince
council members that they were willing to share some of the pain but unwilling
to shoulder the entire burden for a problem that isn't their fault. More than 100 commercial salmon fishermen spoke poignantly about their love
for their industry and its history. Several ended up in tears. The fishermen said it would be ``unconscionable'' and ``grossly
irresponsible'' to cancel the fishing season without first putting a plan in
place to fix the Klamath's problems. In recent years, the water in the Klamath has become too warm, too shallow
and clogged with toxic algae. A parasite is killing about 80 percent of the
juvenile salmon. Fishermen and environmentalists blame then-Interior Secretary Gale Norton's
2002 decision to release millions of gallons of water to southern Oregon farmers
for drought relief -- a decision that ended in the deaths of as many as 70,000
adult salmon in September of that year. The fishermen are particularly angry because they allege it was a decision
based on politics, not science. Many fishermen accuse the White House of pushing the change in policy behind
closed doors to shore up Republican support among farmers. Since 2002, federal and state agencies have done little to solve the Klamath
problem, fishermen -- and environmentalists -- say. Federal regulators have argued that they have little choice but to take
drastic steps to protect the Klamath fish by severely limiting salmon fishing.
King salmon -- whether they are from the sick Klamath or healthy Sacramento
River -- mingle once they reach the ocean, where they spend most of their lives
before returning to their river birthplaces to spawn and die. Regulators say this will be the third year that the number of Klamath salmon
dips below a previously set ``floor'' of 35,000 spawners -- and the council's
management plan calls for drastic measures if that happens. Canceling the entire salmon season would have represented a $150 million hit
for California's commercial salmon fishing industry. No one has yet calculated
the costs of having a severely reduced season. Still, many owners of bait-and-tackle shops, restaurants, motels and other
businesses that depend on recreational salmon fishermen will be breathing a sign
of relief today. The American Sportfishing Association estimated that a
cancellation would have cost California businesses at least $170 million in the
recreational sector alone. Kenney Stagnaro, co-owner of Original Stagnaro Fishing Trips/Bay Cruises in
Santa Cruz, said Northern California charter-boat companies such as his ``rely
on salmon for 90 percent of their business.'' If the season was shut down, Stagnaro said, he would have to eke out a living
offering summertime cod fishing and perhaps more whale-watching trips.Salmon fishermen face harsh restrictions
SEASON NEARLY CANCELED OVER KLAMATH RIVER FISH
Contact Ken McLaughlin at kmclaughlin@mercurynews
.com or (831) 423-3115.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14285011.htm