
What's
happening in the ocean affects salmon the most
By ALLEN
SHORT
March 9, 2008
The
Modesto
Bee
Blaming a favorite
scapegoat -- water agencies that supply our cities and farms -- while
ignoring scientific evidence is irresponsible and won't bring back the
salmon ("Where have the salmon gone?" Feb. 10, editorial).
Many insist that stopping
delta water exports or releasing more water from reservoirs will restore
Central Valley
salmon. However, abundant
evidence shows that neither is a primary cause of the salmon's decline.
At least three other factors -- ocean conditions, commercial fishing and
non-native predators -- contribute to the salmon's decline.
Biologists are reaching a
consensus: Ocean conditions are the primary cause of recent declines in
salmon numbers, especially in 2007.
If the decline in
Central Valley
chinook salmon were
primarily related to water exports from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
or river flows, then only these salmon would decline. But chinook salmon
stocks in
Oregon
,
Washington
and
British Columbia
are also down. And coho
salmon have dropped by more than 70 percent in
California
and
Oregon
coastal streams since 2004.
For the coho salmon, there are no export facilities (canals or
aqueducts) and few dams to blame.
Chinook salmon spend part
of their lives in fresh water and part in the ocean. Their migrations
expose them to natural and man-made threats. If conditions are
unfavorable at any point, fewer fish return to spawn in fresh water.
Variable conditions off
the
Pacific Northwest
coast over the past 30
years negatively impacted the chinook. From 1977-1998, these waters were
unfavorably warm, resulting in a significant drop in returning salmon.
Conditions were particularly variable during the past 10 years.
El Niņo (warming)
periods and La Niņa (cooling) periods corresponded to significant
declines and rebounds in salmon numbers.
In 2005, scientists
observed catastrophic ocean conditions in the
Pacific Northwest
. Normally an upwelling brings nutrients from the ocean floor
to the surface, providing critical support for the entire marine food
chain. In 2005, this upwelling failed to appear for the first time in 50
years. Many species starved. Several scientific models predicted much
lower salmon numbers in 2007 and possibly 2008. So far those forecasts
have proved accurate.
When
Klamath River
chinook salmon declined
after 2000, the ocean harvest of adult
Central Valley
salmon was expanded so commercial fishermen could make up economic
losses. This past April, commercial salmon fishing was allowed off
Fort
Bragg
for the first time in 20
years. The 2007 ocean harvest jumped 31 percent over the previous
10-year average and 218 percent over 2006. Commercial fishing likely
contributed to the 2007 decline in salmon.
A century ago, humans
introduced non-native striped bass into the delta. Bass eat young
salmon. A 2003 study identified stripers as a serious threat to chinook
salmon. Field studies conducted by the water agencies of the San Joaquin
River Group Authority have confirmed this with conclusive evidence of
young chinook, tagged with radio transmitters, consumed by striped bass
in the delta.
Member water agencies
have demonstrated long-term commitment to protecting salmon. We have
extensively restored salmon habitat. For 10 years, our research has
gathered data on how much water flow salmon need. We provide increased
river flows each spring, carefully monitoring the effects. This aids the
survival of young salmon migrating through the delta.
Water agencies are not to
blame for ocean conditions, commercial fishing or non-native predators.
Ignoring scientific evidence only jeopardizes salmon more. One day,
blaming the favorite scapegoat may jeopardize the water supplies our
city and farm customers depend on.
Short is
coordinator of the San Joaquin River Group Authority. Member agencies
are:
Merced
,
Modesto
, Oakdale,
South San Joaquin
and
Turlock
irrigation
districts; the city and
county
of
San Francisco
; Friant Water Users
Authority; and the
San Joaquin
River
Exchange Contractors
Water Authority.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.modbee.com/opinion/community/story/234305.html
|